Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Net Neutrality and Implementing Body Cameras Discussion
The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has the authority to regulate the internet. After gathering information and reviewing data and hearing from experts it has announced in Decmber 2017 that it will void the “net neutrality” FCC regulations put in place during the Obama Administration. Do research on this issue called “net neutrality” on the internet to understand the arguments for/against this action.
Many business and individuals are upset about this new administrative action because it was rapidly done and there are allegations of “fake” comments posted to the FCC website during the notice/comment period by stolen identities (as if they were public comments in support of the FCC’s move to end “net neutraility” but were fake persons posting these comments).
How can those with “legal standing” fight back against the FCC’s decision to void the “net neutrality” regulations by using the three branches of the federal government and how these three branches have general controls over agencies, albeit indirectly at times. Explain. (Hint– at least two online video lectures this term explain the controls/checks on the three branches of the federal government has over federal agencies)
Your Answer:
How can those with “legal standing” fight back against the FCC’s decision to void the “net neutrality” regulations by using the three branches of the federal government and how these three branches have general controls over agencies, albeit indirectly at times.
2.Using the steps in the “design approach” described in your Text: “The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role” — 6.Edition — 2012 (here is a short video to describe this approach also):Design Approach to Administrative Ethics (Links to an external site.)
to develop an appropriate response to the administrative agency decision:
The Chicago Police Department (CPD), a large municipal administrative agency, has multiple ranks of management officials (Police Chief; Assistant Police Chiefs; Majors; Captains & Lieutenants) who are not part of the union and exercise management of the CPD. Then, there are Sergeants and Line Officers who actually patrol the streets and interact with the public and make the arrests. Both the Sergeants and the Line Officers are unionized.
The police chief of the CPD, has over the years, received many excessive force complaints against its police officers. These allegations are reviewed and investigated by the CPD internal affairs which often concludes with “not sustained” final decision on the complaint/charges (ie. that they cannot conclude one way or another that the force is excessive) as it is often a “he said/she said” type testimony and it is inconclusive as to if excessive force occurred or not.
After many months of studying the use of police “body camera” studies, the police chief has decided to adopt body cameras and make all Sergeants and Line Officers wear them. The public is very happy along with local politicians and community leaders. The Union is not happy at all as they were against the use of this equipment for a number of reasons:
- Body Camera footage only tells part of the story;
- The Police Upper Management does not trust the workers;
- Sergeants and Line Officers are now going to be apprehensive in doing their jobs; &
- The expense of this new equipment should have gone into raises to the rank and file;
You are the Assistant Police Chief of CPD and your job is to now implement the new rule (ie. usage of Body Cameras by all Sergeants and Line Officers. Using the Design Approach, explain all of the steps to this approach and how you would address these steps in your efforts to implement this new Body Camera Program at the CPD (ie. Explain your answer using the steps in the design approach and itemize each of these elements and apply them to these facts. )
Your Answer:
Explain your answer using the steps in the design approach and itemize each of these elements and apply them to these facts.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!