Negotiating from A Win-Win Perspective Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Negotiating from A Win-Win Perspective Assignment
BACK TALK Pulling back the curtain on ‘getting to yes’ Best practice: Negotiating from a win-win perspective
r • ‘ by David S. Kaczmarek, FAHRMM, CMRP I
one key skill set of a supply chain executive or anyone from the per- chasing side of the supply chain
is the ability to negotiate. There are few successful supply chain professionals who do not possess this skill.
But there is a differentiator that separates the good negotiators from the best. That is the ability to negotiate from a “win-win” perspective. Best practice supply chain executives have mastered this skill and use it frequently.
Win-win negotiation is one of those concepts that appears self-evident. Isn’t it obvious? If I negotiate so that 1 get some or most of what I wanted and you get some of what you wanted, we hot win, right? The negotiation is successful, right? Unfortunately, that is the understanding most people – those who haven’t studied the concept – have of win-win negotiation. The reality is far different.
The concepts of win-win negotiation come from the Harvard Negotiation Project and date back to the 197() s. This is not a new concept by any means. The theory behind the concept is that negotiations do not have to be a zero-sum game. Most negotiations are adversarial, where early party tries to get the other party to move towards their position at the expense of the other party’s position.
Instead, win-win posits that by following five basic principles the parties can both get more value than either expected to get through the normal adversarial process. It’s not that we both get some of what we wanted – it’s tilts we both get more. That is the magic of win-win.
The five principles of win-win negotiate- ton are: • Cooperation. This is the guiding principle
from which all tile others flow. Tile parties must position themselves as partners in a search for a solution that is beneficial to hot. While there are techniques that an experienced negotiator can use to engine-
der this cooperative spirit, at some point it must exist for win-win to be successful.
People, not problems. People must be separated from the problem. Each negotiation is conducted at two levels, the substantive and the interpersonal. We cannot let our egos and need to win get in the way of finding a solution. By understanding the normal human emo- tons and drivers and developing an empathy with the other party, we can move the negotiation, along. By the end of the negotiation the relationship between the parties should be better than when it began.
Interests, not positions. In most negotiate- tons the sides take positions and try to get tile other side to accept their positions. But each side has many interests that are drive- in the positions. While the positions they select will satisfy many of their interests, rarely will they satisfy all or even most. In fact, most of us don’t even realize all the interests we have. By understanding your interests and discovering the other party’s interests we set the stage for the fourth principle.
Creative options. This is where you brain- storm to find many different solutions that may satisfy both parties. In portico- lar, you look for small concessions from one party that will have greater value for the other. As each side gives up little things in exchange for big things the value to each grows.
Objective standards. Finally, win-win negotiators look for fairness. This can be demonstrated by pointing to fair standards – things that are independent of will and both legitimate and practical, and using fair procedures – those that both parties agree treat them both equally, Tiles basics of win-win negotiation are
fairly simple. To learn more 1 encourage you to read the original book on the subject t, “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving” by Roger Fisher and Wil Liam Uri (1981). The follow-up book by William Uri, “Getting Past No: Negotiating; With Difficult People” (Tw) will give yon even more insight.
But learning about win-win is not the same as using it. This “simple” technique takes lots of practice to enable one to use it effectively. It can be a lot of work trying to negotiate from a win-win perspective, especially if the other party does not want to or just does not understand it. It may seem easier to revert back to a more comfortable sty\ Don’t allow\’ this to lippens. The benefits of using win-win are just too substantial to ignore.
Whether you are trying to get the latest generationPETscanner, working with phi- simians to lower the cost of spine implants. dealing with staff unrest or discussing attendance at a boy/girl party with your pre-teen, using win-win techniques will result in a better outcome. Join the ranks of the exceptional best practice negotiators. Learn – and use – win-win negotiation techniques. HPN
David S. Kaczmarek. FAHRMM, Cmdr., is a Derry, NH-based director at Wheelspin Partners, a Huron Cloudily^ Group Practice, Chicago. Kaczmarek has more Thai 25 year– experience in healthcare administration aim material? management, including director positions at several hospitals and systems. He can be readied via e-mail at Kaczmarski huronconsiiltinggroup.com.
64 M a y 2010 – HEÄLIHCÄRE PURCHASING N€WS • wwvi/.hpnonline.com
Copyright of Healthcare Purchasing News is the property of KSR Publishing and its content may not be copied
or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission.
However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!