Need vs. Surplus Dependency vs. Self-reliance
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Dependency vs. Self-reliance
This is a difficult balance: Need vs. Surplus • Dependency vs. Self-reliance
- Those in need have a right to the resources of those who have.
- Those in need have no right to the resources of those who have.
- –
- Sharing is voluntary; to share or not is equally moral.
- If sharing is optional, those with a surplus of food, money, opportunity, the ability have no obligation to share.
- –
- Does need, create an obligation in those with a surplus an obligation to share?
- Does need, create no obligation in those with a surplus to share and only a voluntary choice to help or not with an effect on one’s moral status?
- –
- Do not forget, multiple values can be of equal importance. Where you create a hierarchy or seek to balance, you are admitting the value are incommensurable–there is no common measure– your language game adopts an arbitrary hierarchy of priority.
Do the self-reliant, those with a surplus, have an obligation to care for the dependent who is not self-sufficient? Why do the needy have a right to the resources or surplus of others? Apply the Need vs. Surplus and Dependency vs. Self-reliance distinctions to two areas that need moral consideration what is your moral language game that identifies organizes the distinction between:
What is voluntary (a matter of personal preference) vs. An Obligation (a duty owed to another with a claim right for that task)
The woman who does not want to be a mother denies an obligation to provide the resources of her body for a term of nine months for a baby she does not want to be born.
Given a surplus one may believe there is a choice to share or not; while another might believe having a surplus creates a community obligation to share.
- Abortion
- Woman’s Right to choice vs. zygote, embryo, or fetus right to be born
- Woman’s rights vs. Unborn claim to nurturing resources
- Poverty and Hunger
- Poverty and Hunger vs. Wealthy
- Dependency vs. Self-reliance
Explain the similarity and differences of moral obligation between Mother vs. an Unborn and The Wealthy vs. the poor.
Prepare your answer as described below. Not any words, but words you choose to make great sentences. Sentences that make your point clear and concise. Sentences that contain no fluff words or wasted words or packing words for fill. Make your point with grace, style, and wit.
———
Introduction Paragraph
- The first sentence is a six-word sentence.
- The remaining sentences may be as long or as short as you like.
- This paragraph may or may not be 125 words.
Body Paragraphs
- The first sentence of each of the two paragraphs shall be a six-word sentence.
- The remaining sentences may be as long or as short as you like.
- Depending on the length of your introduction and conclusion paragraphs, the bulk of your essay will be in the two-body paragraphs, so your total word count is 500 words.
Conclusion Paragraph
- The first sentence is a six-word sentence.
- The remaining sentences may be as long or as short as you like.
- This paragraph may or may not be 125 words.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!