Nanocarrier Spray Better Crops Without Genetic Modification
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Nanocarrier Spray Better Crops Without Genetic Modification
Please respond to comments your article has received.
My post:
Nanocarrier spray: Better crops without genetic modification.
The study summarizes a research article by RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (CSRS) in Japan. The research Centre discovered how they could utilize technology to improve crops quality. It involves changing plant genomes whereby specific chemicals are sprayed to the crop’s leaves to produce bioactive molecules into plant cells. I found this technology interesting since apart from enhancing crops to grow with quality, crops can resist pests or become more resistant to drought. Therefore, the article justifies how farmers can produce genetically modified organisms (GMOs) foods instead of waiting for crops to mature naturally.
The article highlights that the technology may be expensive, time-consuming, and only a few people know, making it difficult to be applicable in many places. However, I find it interesting that the RIKEN CSRS researchers developed an alternative to GM food to overcome these problems. Mr. Masaki Dahari, who led the team, outlines that they faced challenges just like any other project. One of them was how to develop a delivery method that would be practical for cultivated crops under actual agricultural conditions, and they identified it as spraying crops widely.
The researchers noted several nanoparticles that can penetrate plant cells but focused on cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs). This is because CPPs can target specific structures inside plants cells, for instance, chloroplasts. The article outlines that the researchers justified that the technology performs best when plasmid DNA is attached to the CPPs. The researchers also silenced genes specific to chloroplasts by including a chloroplast-targeting peptide to a particular CPP-RNA complex.
Comment 1: (Connor)
When reading your article, I haven’t heard of this topic yet. It’s a great choice because the benefits from the technology could save tons of money and dramatically reduce the problems involved in farming. I know it says that the best form is to spray the crops but I wonder if drip irrigation could work just as well. We have so many different types of farming techniques and they all provide a specific benefit for how it’s done, and I wonder if other ways such as injecting it into the roots or the soil near the crops could have a desirable outcome.
Being able to protect the crops against pesticides and other harmful factors would be a huge win for us. It would mean cleaner food and hopefully it would help people’s diet. However, normally when something helps us, people charge more for it. I wonder if even though it would be better for crops and everything, I think it would cost us humans more money.Comment 2:
I actually have heard of this kind of technology being used in farming, I come from a very small community but a large community of farmers! My best friend’s dad/family farm is a large contributor to our little community with crops and pumpkins every year.
These types of technologies would be useful in many different produce farms such as farms on the west southern coast for all round year use and over the Midwest sporadically through farming seasons. It honestly would be quite helpful in the squash/pumpkin growing too, I use to hand plant 5+ acres. Remembering the pumpkin seeds were bright teal color before putting them in the ground, being told to not touch our faces or mouths. What was being used was a type of pesticide that caused animals such as deer, rabbits, groundhogs, raccoons along with many other animals to stop eating the seeds before germination.
I am also curious as to what Connor (1st comment) had said about Drip irrigation over spray irrigation to help with air pollution. That is a large problem when it comes to farmers spraying crops in spring/summer and even fall sometimes. When growing up we were always told if you see farmers in the field with sprayers you don’t ride with your windows down. I believe that this system of farm would be a lot more beneficial in the long run for everyone, everything and everywhere. Paying and invest in personal health and world health is truthfully a very important aspect to taking care of oneself (self-love). I am hopeful for this sustainable shift in the agricultural community.
Nanocarrier Spray Better Crops Without Genetic Modification
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! Nanocarrier Spray Better Crops Without Genetic Modification