Mr. W Emergency Medical Services Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Mr. W Emergency Medical Services Case Study
Mr. W is an 83-year-old man who was brought to the hospital from a long-term care facility by emergency medical services after reporting severe dyspnea and shortness of breath. He has been experiencing cold like symptoms for the past 2 days. He has a productive cough with thick yellowish sputum.
When Mr. W awoke in the nursing home, it was found that he was having difficulty breathing even after using his albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI). He appears very anxious and is in respiratory distress. His history includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) related to smoking 2 packs of cigarettes per day since he was 15 years old; he quit smoking 2 years ago when he was admitted to the long-term facility. Mr. W has been in continent of urine and stool for the past 2 years.
In the emergency department, Mr. W undergoes chest radiography, and admission laboratory tests are performed, including serum electrolyte levels and a complete blood count. A sputum sample is sent to the laboratory for culture and sensitivity testing and Gram staining.
Mr. W’s vital sign values are as follows:
Blood pressure Heart rate O2 saturation Respiratory rate Temperature
154/92 mm Hg 118 beats/min 88% on 1 L/min oxygen by nasal cannula 38 breaths/min 100.9°F (38.3°C) (oral)
Mr. W’s ABG results include the following: pH, 7.37; arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), 55.4 mm Hg; arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), 51.2 mm Hg; bicarbonate (HCO3␣) level, 38 mEq/L (38 mmol/L).
Which priority actions will the nurse take when the patient is initially admitted to the emergency department (ED)? Select all that apply. 1. Place the patient on a cardiac monitor.
- Get a baseline set of vital signs. 3. Draw admission labs and place a saline lock. 4. Change the patient’s adult pad. 5. Send the patient for a chest x-ray. 6. Order the patient a lunch tray.
What is the priority nursing concern for this patient? 1. Skin care due to incontinence 2. Clearance of thick secretions 3. Rapid heart rate
- Elevated temperature Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
The RN assesses Mr. W in the emergency department. Which assessment findings are consistent with a diag- nosis of COPD? Select all that apply. 1. Enlarged neck muscles
- Forward bent posture 3. Respiratory rate 15 to 25 breaths/min 4. Inspiratory and expiratory wheezes 5. Blue-tinged dusky appearance 6. Symmetrical lung expansion
The health care provider’s (HCP’s) prescribed actions for this patient include all of the following. Which inter- vention should the nurse complete first? 1. Send an arterial blood gas (ABG) sample to the
laboratory. 2. Schedule pulmonary function tests. 3. Repeat chest radiography each morning. 4. Administer albuterol via MDI 2 puffs every 4 hours.
What is the nurse’s interpretation of these results? 1. Compensated metabolic acidosis with hypoxemia 2. Compensated metabolic alkalosis with hypoxemia 3. Compensated respiratory acidosis with hypoxemia 4. Compensated respiratory alkalosis with hypoxemia
Based on the patient’s ABG results, what are the nurse’s priority actions at this time? Select all that apply. 1. Administer oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula. 2. Initiate a rapid response.
- Teach the patient how to cough and deep breathe. 4. Begin IV normal saline at 100 mL/hr. 5. Arrange a transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). 6. Remind the patient to practice incentive spirometry
every hour while awake
Which intervention would the RN assign to an experienced LPN/LVN? 1. Drawing a sample for ABG determination 2. Administering albuterol by hand-held nebulizer 3. Measuring vital signs every 2 hours
- Increasing oxygen delivery to 2 L/min via nasal cannula
Which interventions would the acute care RN dele- gate to an experienced unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP)? Select all that apply. 1. Changing the patient’s in continence padas needed 2. Performing pulse oximetry every shift
- Teaching the patient to cough and deep breathe 4. Reminding the patient to use incentives pirometry
every hour while awake 5. Assessing the patient’s breath sounds every shift 6. Encouraging the patient to drink adequate oral
fluids
Mr. W’s emergency department lab values include a serum potassium of 2.8 mg/dL (2.8 mmol/L). What is the priority nursing action at this time? 1. Teach the patient about potassium-rich foods.
- Provide the patient with oxygen at 2 L per nasal cannula.
- Contact and notify the HCP immediately. 4. Initiate 0.9% saline at 20 mL/hr.
Mr. WisreceivinganIVdoseofpotassium10mEq/ 100 mL (10 mmol/100 mL) normal saline to run over 1 hour. The UAP asks the nurse why it takes so long to infuse such a small amount of fluid. What should the nurse explain to the UAP? Select all that apply.
“IV potassium is very irritating to the veins and can cause phlebitis.”
- “Tissue damaged by potassium can become necrotic.”
- “Oral potassium can cause nausea, so IV potassium is preferred.”
- “The maximum recommended infusion rate for IV potassium is 5 to 10mEq/hr (5 to 10 mmol/hr).”
- “That’s a good question, and I will ask the HC Pif I can give the drug IV push.”
- “The goal is to prevent infiltration in to the tissue.”
During morning rounds, the nurse notes all of these assessment findings for Mr. W. Which finding indi- cates a worsening of the patient’s condition? 1. Barrel-shaped chest
- Clubbed fingers on both hands 3. Crackles bilaterally 4. Frequent productive cough
The nurse reports the morning assessment findings (see question 11) to the HCP. Which prescribed intervention is most directly related to the nurse’s assessment findings?
- Administer furosemide 20 mg IV push now. 2. Keep accurate records of intake and output. 3. Administer potassium 20 mEq (20 mmol) orally
every morning. 4. Weigh the patient every morning.
Which assessment finding would the nurse instruct the UAP to report immediately? 1. Incontinence of urine and stool 2. 1-lb (0.45-kg) weight loss since admission
- Patient cough productive of greenish-yellow sputum
- Eating only half of breakfast and lunch
The UAP checks morning vital signs and immediately reports the following values to the nurse. Which takes priority when notifying the HCP? 1. Heart rate of 96 beats/min
- Blood pressure of 160/90 mm Hg 3. Respiratory rate of 34 breaths/min 4. Oral temperature of 103.5°F (39.7°C)
An LPN/LVN tells the RN that the patient is now receiving oxygen at 2 L/min via nasal cannula and his pulse oximetry reading is now 91%, but he still has crackles in the bases of his lungs. What intervention should the RN assign to the LPN/LVN?
- Begin creating a plan for discharging the patient. 2. Administerfurosemide20mgorallyeachmorning. 3. Get a baseline weight for the patient now. 4. AdministercefotaximeIVpiggybackevery6hours.
The RN administers the patient’s first dose of IV cefotaxime. Within 15 minutes, Mr. W develops a rash with fever and chills. What is the nurse’s first action at this time?
- Discontinue the IV infusion. 2. Administer 2 tablets of acetaminophen. 3. Measure the area of the rash. 4. Check for numbness and tingling
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!