Moral Worth of The Decisions Made by Toyota
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Moral Worth of The Decisions Made by Toyota
Read the Toyota Motor Corporation and Employee “Suggestion” System case that can be found in the sixth chapter of the textbook. Using ethical theories and principles learned in this course, especially subsidiarity and natural law, analyze the moral worth of the decisions made by Toyota. Also discuss the various options open to Toyota, and choose the one you think would have been the best. Justify the choice you make using resources from this course. You are encouraged to submit your own threads to this discussion as well as respond to threads left by other students. 350 words.
Lecture:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/
Rubric:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Employee “Suggestion” System:
The principle of subsidiarity can be applied to business settings for reasons that go beyond poverty alleviation. The practices of a division of Toyota Motor Corporation are a case in point.
In 2012, Toyota sold more cars than any other company in the world, with an estimated 9.71 million vehicle sales. It has spent many years at the top of the sales list and although it has had some issues with recalls in the past several years and leadership stumbles, overall it is highly respected and regarded as an innovative company. One reason for this is the Toyota Production System (TPS), which differs significantly from the systems that have historically been used in US car production.
A joint collaboration in Fremont, California, between General Motors (GM) and Toyota that began in the early 1980s illustrates the differences in the US and Toyota systems and how the principle of subsidiarity relates. There had previously been a GM plant in Fremont, but it was the worst production facility in the US system due to the systems in place there, the relationship between management and workers, and the poor work ethic and drug and alcohol culture of workers. After it was shut down, it sat idle and no new industry moved into the facility. Toyota suggested this site as a place where GM and Toyota could collaborate. Toyota offered to teach GM all of its production facility secrets if GM taught Toyota how to work within the US market. Although Toyota had been exporting cars to the United States, it wanted to open production facilities here.
The first step of the working relationship involved former Fremont United Auto Workers workers going to Japan to for two-week training sessions. Then when enough employees were trained, the California location could open and begin production. When the US workers first arrived at the Toyota plant in Japan, they could not believe how different the production line was. In the TPS, managers and employees work together. Everything has a team-based approach. Each individual has a job to complete, but each is part of a group and a team with a leader. If someone makes a mistake or cannot keep up with production or there is some issue on the line, the worker will pull a cord that alerts others with a light and a happy little song that there is an issue. If the worker and others who come to help cannot resolve the issue, they pull the cord again and stop the entire production line. As soon as the issue is resolved, the line begins again.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!