Money and The Financial System
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Money and The Financial System
Case Study 14.1: Mackerel Economics in Federal Prisons
The economist R.A Radford spent several years in prisoner-of-war camps in Italy and Germany during World War II,
and he wrote about his experience. Although economic activity was sharply limited, many features of a normal
economy was found in the prison life he observed. For example, in the absence of any offi cial currency behind
bars, cigarettes came to serve all three roles of money: medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value.
Cigarettes were of uniform quality, of limited supply (they came in rations from the International Red Cross),
reasonably durable, and individually could support small transactions or, in packs, larger ones. Prices measured in
cigarettes became fairly uniform and well known throughout a camp of up to 50,000 prisoners of many nationalities.
Now fast-forward half a century to the U.S. federal prison system. Prisoners are not allowed to hold cash. Whatever money sent by relatives
or earned from prison jobs (at 40 cents an hour) goes into commissary accounts that allow inmates to buy items such as snacks and toiletries.
In the absence of cash, to trade among themselves federal prisoners also came to settle on cigarettes as their commodity money (despite offi –
cial prohibitions against trade of any kind among inmates). Cigarettes served as the informal
money until 2004, when smoking was banned in all federal prisons.
Once the ban took effect, the urge to trade created incentives to come up with some
other commodity money. Prisoners tried other items sold at the commissary including
postage stamps, cans of tuna, and Power Bars, but none of that seemed to catch on.
Eventually prisoners settled on cans of mackerel, a bony, oily fi sh. So inmates informally use
“macks”—as the commodity money came to be called—to settle gambling debts, to buy
services from other inmates (such as ironing, shoe shining, and cell cleaning), and to buy
goods from other inmates (including special foods prepared with items from the commissary
and illicit items such as home-brewed “prison hooch”). At those federal prisons where the
commissary opens only one day a week, some prisoners fi ll the void by running mini-com-
missaries out of their lockers.
After wardens banned cans (because they could be refashioned into makeshift knives),
the commodity money quickly shifted from cans of mackerel to plastic-and-foil pouches of
mackerel. The mack is considered a good stand-in for the dollar because each pouch costs
about $1 at the commissary, yet most prisoners, aside from weight-lifters seeking extra
protein, would rather trade macks than eat them.
Wardens try to discourage the mackerel economy by limiting the amount of food prison-
ers can stockpile. Those caught using macks as money can lose commissary privileges, can
be reassigned to a less desirable cell, or can even spend time in the “hole.” Still, market
forces are so strong that the mackerel economy survives in many federal prisons.
SOURCES: R. A. Radford, “The Economic Organization of a P.O.W. Camp,” Economica, 12 (November 1945): 189–201: and Justin Scheck, “Mackerel Economics in Prisons Leads to Appreciation of the Oily Fillets,” Wall Street Journal, 2 October 2008.
QUESTION 1. How well do pouches of mackerel satisfy the six properties of ideal money (durable, portable, divisible, uniform quality, low opportunity cost,
stable value)?
14
26692_CS_01-42.indd 2826692_CS_01-42.indd 28 11/11/11 6:09 PM11/11/11 6:09 PM
Case Study 14.2: The Hassle of Small Change
About 8 billion U.S. pennies were minted in 2009, and about 150 billion pennies circulated. That’s about 500 pennies per U.S. resident. Most
pennies are resting in change jars, drawers, or other gathering places for the lowly coin. Pennies are abandoned in the tiny bins and donation
cans at store counters. Many people won’t bother to pick one up on the sidewalk (as evidenced by the number you fi nd there). The penny, like
all U.S. currency, has over time been robbed of its exchange value by infl ation. Today’s penny buys only one-seventh as much as it did in the
1950s. Pennies can’t be used in parking meters, vending machines, or pay telephones, and penny candy is long gone. To avoid the hassle of
small change, some restaurants, such as the Vanilla Bean Café in Pomfret, Connecticut, charge prices exactly divisible by 25 cents. That way,
pennies, nickels, and dimes aren’t needed for any transaction.
The exchange value of the penny has declined as the cost of minting it has risen. For more than a century, the penny was 95 percent
copper. In 1982, copper prices reached record levels, so the U.S. Mint began making pennies from zinc, with just a thin copper fi nish. Then the
price of zinc rose, boosting the metal cost of a penny in 2009 to 0.8 cents. Add to that the 0.8-cent minting cost per penny, and you get
1.6 cents per coin. So the government loses 0.6 cents on each penny minted, or $14.4 million on the pennies minted in 2009. Nickels, which
are mostly copper, are also money losers; in 2009 they cost 6 cents to make.
Has the penny outlived its usefulness? In the face of rising metal prices, the government has some options. First option: mint them from a
lower-cost alloy. This would buy some time, but infl ation would eventually drive the metallic cost above the exchange value of the coin. Second
option: abolish the penny. Take it out of circulation. Countries that have eliminated their smallest coins include Australia, Britain, Finland, Hong
Kong, and the Netherlands. New Zealand eliminated its 5-cent coin, as well as its 2-cent and 1-cent coins. The United States abolished the
half-cent coin in 1857, at a time when it was worth 8 cents in today’s purchasing power.
Third option: decree that the penny is worth fi ve cents, the same as
a nickel. At the same time, the government could withdraw nickels from
circulation. With pennies worth so much more, there would be no incentive
to hoard them for their metallic value (a current problem), and it would likely
be decades before the metallic value caught up with the exchange value.
Rebasing the penny to 5 cents would increase the money supply by about $6
billion, a drop in the bucket compared to a total money supply of $1.7 trillion,
so the move would have virtually no effect on infl ation.
If the penny gets so little respect, why did the Treasury mint 2.4 billion
in 2009? As noted, some people are hoarding pennies, waiting for the day
when the metallic value exceeds the exchange value. Another source of
demand is the sales tax, which adds pennies to transactions in 44 states.
Charities also collect millions from change cans located at check-out coun-
ters. And zinc producers lobby heavily to keep the penny around as a major
user of the metal. Thus, the penny still has its boosters. That’s why retailers
continue to order pennies from their banks, these banks order pennies from the Fed, the Fed orders them from the U.S. Mint, and the Mint
presses yet more pennies into idle service.
SOURCES: Austan Goolsbee, “Now that the Penny Isn’t Worth Much, It’s Time to Make It Worth 5 Cents,” New York Times, 1 February 2007; Elizabeth Williamson, “Will Nickel-Free Nickels Make a Dime’s Worth of Difference,” Wall Street Journal, 10 May 2010; and Thomas Sargent and Francois Velde, The Big Problem of Small Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002). View the rounded prices on Vanilla Bean Café’s menu at http://www.thevanillabeancafe.com/.
QUESTION 1. In countries where the monetary system has broken down, what are some alternatives to which people have resorted to carry out
exchange?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!