Mining operations disrupting wildlife habitats
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Mining operations disrupting wildlife habitats
Mining operations can have significant impacts on wildlife habitats, with potential consequences for the long-term health and viability of ecosystems. Mining involves the extraction of minerals and other resources from the earth, which can cause damage to natural habitats through a range of activities, including deforestation, land clearing, excavation, and the use of heavy machinery.
One of the primary ways that mining operations can disrupt wildlife habitats is through habitat fragmentation. This occurs when large areas of land are cleared or excavated to make way for mining activities, creating barriers that isolate wildlife populations from one another. This can make it difficult for animals to move between different habitats, access food, and water resources, and breed with other members of their species, which can lead to reduced genetic diversity and increased susceptibility to disease.
Mining operations can also cause direct harm to wildlife through noise pollution, air pollution, and water pollution. Noise pollution can disrupt wildlife behaviors, including breeding and communication, and can cause animals to abandon their habitats. Air pollution from mining activities can cause respiratory problems in wildlife and reduce the availability of oxygen in the environment, while water pollution can harm aquatic wildlife and impact the quality of water resources that animals rely on for survival.
Another way that mining operations can impact wildlife habitats is through the destruction of vegetation and soil. Mining activities often involve the removal of topsoil and vegetation, which can lead to erosion and soil degradation. This can impact the ability of vegetation to regenerate and reduce the availability of food and habitat resources for wildlife.
Finally, mining operations can also have indirect impacts on wildlife habitats through the creation of new roads, pipelines, and other infrastructure. This can increase human access to previously remote areas, leading to increased hunting and poaching pressure on wildlife populations. It can also increase the risk of invasive species introductions, as well as the spread of disease and other pathogens.
To mitigate the impacts of mining operations on wildlife habitats, several strategies can be implemented. One of the most important is to minimize the footprint of mining activities by adopting practices such as selective mining, which involves the targeted extraction of minerals from specific areas, and the use of less invasive mining methods such as underground mining.
Another strategy is to prioritize the conservation of wildlife habitats in areas where mining operations are planned or ongoing. This can involve measures such as the creation of protected areas, the implementation of land-use planning and zoning regulations, and the adoption of best management practices to minimize the impacts of mining activities on wildlife habitats.
Finally, it is important to monitor and manage wildlife populations in and around mining areas to ensure their long-term survival. This can involve measures such as habitat restoration, population management, and the implementation of monitoring programs to track wildlife populations and assess the effectiveness of conservation efforts.
In conclusion, mining operations can have significant impacts on wildlife habitats, with potential consequences for the long-term health and viability of ecosystems. By adopting practices to minimize the footprint of mining activities, prioritizing the conservation of wildlife habitats, and monitoring and managing wildlife populations in and around mining areas, we can help to mitigate the impacts of mining on wildlife biodiversity.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Mining operations disrupting wildlife habitats
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!