Micro-managing everything and everyone
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Micro-managing everything and everyone
Micro-managing is a common behavior that involves excessively controlling or scrutinizing every detail of a project, task, or person. It can be detrimental to both the micro-manager and those who are being managed, as it can create a stressful and unproductive work environment.
There are several reasons why someone might engage in micro-managing behavior. One reason is a desire for control. Micro-managers may feel the need to control every aspect of a project or task to ensure that it meets their exact specifications. They may be afraid that if they don’t micro-manage, things will not be done correctly or that they will lose control.
Another reason for micro-managing behavior is a lack of trust in others. Micro-managers may not trust their team members to complete tasks or projects to their standards, and as a result, they feel the need to oversee every aspect of the work. This lack of trust can damage team morale and make team members feel undervalued and unappreciated.
Additionally, micro-managing can be a result of perfectionism. Micro-managers may have an unrealistic expectation of perfection, and as a result, they feel the need to control every detail to ensure that the end result is flawless. This behavior can be exhausting for both the micro-manager and their team members, as it often leads to excessive workloads and burnout.
Micro-managing can have several negative consequences. It can stifle creativity and innovation, as team members may be hesitant to suggest new ideas or approaches if they feel like they will be immediately shut down or scrutinized. It can also create a stressful and uncomfortable work environment, as team members may feel like they are constantly being watched or judged.
To overcome micro-managing behavior, it’s important to first recognize that it is a problem. Self-awareness is key to making positive changes in behavior. Once you recognize that you are micro-managing, take steps to delegate responsibilities and trust your team members. This can help build their confidence and create a more productive work environment.
It’s also important to establish clear expectations and deadlines for projects and tasks. This can help alleviate the need to micro-manage, as team members will have a clear understanding of what is expected of them and when it is due. Providing constructive feedback and acknowledging successes can also help build trust and confidence in team members.
Finally, it’s important to recognize the value of mistakes and failure. No one is perfect, and mistakes are a natural part of the learning process. Embracing a growth mindset and allowing room for mistakes can create a more supportive and creative work environment, and can lead to greater innovation and success in the long run.
In conclusion, micro-managing behavior can be detrimental to both the micro-manager and those who are being managed. It can create a stressful and unproductive work environment and stifle creativity and innovation. To overcome micro-managing behavior, it’s important to recognize the problem, delegate responsibilities, establish clear expectations, and recognize the value of mistakes and failure. By taking these steps, you can create a more positive and productive work environment for yourself and your team.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Micro-managing everything and everyone
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!