Methodologies of Continuous Process Improvement
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources: 6Subject: BusinessTopic: Different Methodologies of Continuous Process Improvement – Writer please call me and we can discuss your comfort level of et, DMAIC, Lean Six Sigma, Malcom Baldrige, 4DX, Root Cause AnalysisPaper details:
I have a 2-3 page executive summary then a 8-10 (prefer 10 pages) page paper that will include the executive summary. The assignment is below for the executive summary. This Executive Summary is the first part of a 2 part business writing assignment for this course/semester. The following general directions apply to both parts of these assignments. Specifics relative to the Executive Summary are then below…
1. The overall intent of this assignment is to assess the student’s ability to incorporate course material in critical analysis of a fresh topic.2. Students are to self-select their topic, but in light of the above, should ensure they have ample space to engage course material.3. Students may use an industry, company, technology, trend, social issue, sports/hobby, etc., as long as they are able to connect to class.4. Focusing on a published case study or single article will not typically provide enough scope/material to adequately discuss.5. Writing and format should be professional in competency and presentation, suitable for submission in a business environment.
6. A single format guide was provided in Week 1 as an example, but should not be merely used as a template.7. Students should conduct cursory internet research into sample business reports, annual shareholders reports, etc. for other examples.8. The Bloch Communication Center and UMKC Writing Studio provide additional resources for those desiring editing assistance.9. At a minimum, this course assumes acceptable business writing to be 11-12 point font and single-spaced, with average 1″ margins. Additional thoughts on Executive Summary content and intent…
1. Bottom line, I am looking for you to show me you “get it” – that you’re digesting our course material and can apply it to outside material.2. General business writing philosophy is to keep it “tight” – be concise.3. Lead with a brief, solid intro – tell me what you’ll tell me – what’s the intent of the document and why should I read.4. Then tell me – body of the document should logically follow your intro with historical context, overview, problem, options, risks, analysis, your recommendation, etc.5. Conclusion – close with a short summary – remind me what you told me – critical point(s).
6. That same above format/outline will apply to both the Executive Summary and the Final Paper.7. Specifics of the outline will vary, based on your specific topic/paper. For instance, if you’re submitting a business plan for a start-up, it’s going to look different than a risk analysis of supply chains in post-disaster scenarios, or a comparison of design philosophies between Apple and Samsung, etc., etc.8. You will likely expand the framework of your Executive Summary into your Final Paper, but this initial short draft gets you started, primes the pump, and gives us a chance to dialog, if needed, on format/approach/topic.
9. I expect approximately 2 pages for this Executive Summary, which may also contribute to the 8-10 page Final Paper deliverable.10. Be objective, watch out for subjective claims! If you’re using a statistic, where did you find that data? Cite your reference sources.11. I typically expect an average of 1 source per page in quantity – for our final paper I expect a minimum of 6 sources, plus our textbook, if/when relevant. Lastly, remember to have fun with this assignment! Pick a topic you’re truly interested in. Your passion for the topic will make it more enjoyable for you to research/write and form me to read/grade. Use this as a chance to explore something that truly excites you!
Yes, the topic is truly wide open and that is intentional, but can make it a bit challenging to get traction. Start with something that interests you, that you’re curious about. A new trend in technology or products or services. Perhaps a company you’ve worked at, aspire to work at, or just respect in general. Or an industry that fascinates you or that you enjoy. What is it that draws you to those products/services/companies/industries? Now, ask yourself what areas/topics in this course interest you more? Then look for intersections between those topics and the companies or industries you’re investigating.
Picking an existing company can be fine, but make sure you’re looking at their operations and/or supply chain. I don’t want just a mere history/financial report. What do they do well? What do they not? What opportunities are there for them to improve? What risks should they be concerned about? How do they compare to others in their industry? Perhaps compare 2 or 3 specific competitors and how they reacted to the same challenge/crisis.
I’m not so much concerned with the exact outline/format of the executive summary, as using it as an opportunity to give you feedback on your choice of topic, writing style, research approach/sources, etc. By research approach, I mean where are you sourcing your info/data? Obviously wikipedia, internet, and company websites are fine to get an idea, but I expect specific reference sources to be cited.I’ve broken this paper into 2 separate assignments, in large part to get everyone started, so these questions over topic and format aren’t a stress at the end of the semester. Don’t stress too much on this first part of the paper. The goal is just to get you thinking and writing! 2nd Part The final Paper DSOM 5545Larry WiggerSpring 2017January 25, 2017A Few Thoughts on Business Report FormatOperations and Supply Chain ManagementIntroduction
This document is intended to provide the student reader with some relevant thoughts on preferred format for business reports. There is plenty of opportunity for students to apply creativity in how they structure their papers. As such, this document is not necessarily intended as a template to be followed exactly on deliverables. It is suggested that students also drawn on external examples of professional business reports for inspiration, including documents such as annual reports to shareholders.Executive SummaryWhen called upon to do so, it is frequently useful to provide an executive summary of your full white paper. By definition, a white paper is typically used to establish a position on a developing issue under consideration.
As such, it can frequently become relatively extensive, detailed, and laden with research sources. Business executive do not always have the time or inclination to commit themselves to fully digesting such papers, at least not until they are convinced of the value and/or necessity of doing so. Therefore, a 1-3 page Executive Summary becomes invaluable in condensing the main points of the broader White Paper. A target ratio of 10% in page length is usually appropriate, with an average of 2 pages frequently being sufficient. Students should use an executive summary deliverable as a chance to confirm topic, sources, and format with the Instructor.Body of DocumentBusiness reports are arguably most frequently single-spaced, with an anecdotal observation of preference for Arial or Calibri fonts in 10-12 point size.
Again, the student should feel empowered to establish their own professional communication style, within reason. Normal graphic design rules of limiting the variety of styles on a single page are probably wise. In other words, single style of font, bold/italics only when needed, secondary size limited to larger title and/or smaller footnotes. Look of the document should not distract from message…Conclusion
Quality business writing is clear and concise. Length of the document, in and of itself, is not the goal or of value. Whether developing an elevator pitch for business development or learning to engage your reader early in a document, students will benefit from practicing direct, abbreviated communications. That said, if it adds value to the topic, include it. Graphs, charts, diagrams, flowcharts, and photos can all be very helpful. Tell your reader what you will tell them (Introduction), tell them (Body), and then tell them what you told them (Conclusion).Reference CitationsExternal research sources should be listed, either by footnotes on each page, in a citation list at the end, or on a separate bibliography page.
An average of one external source per document page has been observed and seems realistic. Therefore, a six to ten page paper will probably need a half-dozen research documents, including academic texts, business books, periodicals, and reputable and relevant internet sources.1. Purchasing & Supply Chain Management, 6th Edition; Monczka, Robert M., Handfield, Robert B., Giunipero, Larry C., Patterson, James L.; 978-1-285-86968-1.2. Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 3rd Edition; Mangan, John, Lalwani, Chandra, Butcher, Tim and Javadpour, Roya; Wiley; 978-1-119-11782-7.3. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence, 10th Edition; Evans, James R. and Lindsay, William M.; Cengage South-Western; 978-1-305-66254-4.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!