Medicare Contract H5322 Through Care Improvement Failure
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Medicare Contract H5322 Through Care Improvement Failure
In a letter released on September 11, CMS informed UnitedHealthcare that it’s Medicare contract H5322 through Care Improvement Plus failed to meet its medical loss ratio requirement for the third year in a row and, as a result, would be suspended for the year. “As a result of this determination, Care Improvement Plus will be prohibited from accepting any MA-PD plan enrollments which would be effective January 1, 2020, through December 1, 2020,” CMS announced. Each year, a plan must achieve a certain medical loss ratio (MLR), meaning a certain amount of every premium dollar must go to consumers’ medical claims or health improvement.
If payers overreach this threshold, putting more premium dollars toward administration and health plan upkeep, the payers must pay it back to their consumers in the form of a rebate. As a Medicare contract on the large group health insurance market, UHC is required to reach an 85 percent MLR for Care Improvement Plus’s H5322 contract, such that $0.85 out of every premium dollar goes toward beneficiaries’ health needs. Care Improvement Plus has gradually been ramping up the plan’s MLR to meet that threshold but missed the mark. In the past three years, UHC paid 71.3 percent for the calendar year (CY) 2016, 83.9 percent for CY 2017, and 84.1 percent for CY 2018.
Meeting the medical loss ratio stipulation has been a challenge for payers for years. In the past, fraud prevention and recovery have prevented payers from reaching their required MLRs. For UHC, the payer says, the inhibitor was the corporate tax rate. “In mid-2019 a change in the corporate tax rate went into effect, which adversely impacted MLR for H5322 plans,” the payer explained in a written statement to HealthPayerIntelligence.com. “We subsequently factored that change into our MLR calculations and anticipate achieving an MLR above 85 percent in 2019, which will allow us to enroll new members for 2021.
We anticipate that we will achieve the MLR threshold in 2019 for H5322, which will allow us to resume enrollment in these plans in 2021.” The payer noted that there are alternative UHC plans in the affected areas and promised an increase in benefits and coverage for existing members, which includes 40,000 dually eligible members. While Care Improvement Plus may not accept new enrollees after December 1, 2019, those who already have a Care Improvement Plus plan will still receive coverage. For employers, Care Improvement Plus may submit a waiver to enroll more individuals to their existing group health insurance plans but they may not bring on new groups for employer-sponsored insurance. If the plan fails to meet the 85 percent MLR requirement for five consecutive years, the contract must be terminated. UHC is not alone in facing a reprimand from CMS, however, it is the only plan that failed to meet the MLR so far this year. CMS has placed 13 sanctions this year, including the one on Care Improvement Plus South-Central Insurance Company, as well as one termination. MLRs were instituted to protect consumers’ interests and ensure that they are receiving benefits for their premium dollars. It has been discussed as a potential method of holding dental insurers accountable to investing appropriately in consumer care as well.
For example, when California realized in 2018 that only $0.76 of every premium dollar goes towards a consumer’s health under the average California dental plan, the state instituted an MLR for the dental industry. While MLRs set up protections for consumers and incentives for payers to increase benefits, MLRs are also driving payers’ rebates to historic levels, particularly in the individual health insurance market. On the individual health insurance market alone, payers will be paying back $1.3 billion to members this year, the highest amount since the Affordable Care Act took effect. While UHC’s plan is suspended for a year, the payer will invest more premium dollars into members’ benefits, over and above its 2018 increases. UHC’s scenario draws attention to the potential challenges payers face in maintaining an MLR and the goals of such an approach.
- Write a short summary of the article.
- Define Medical Loss Ratio.
- As a CFO of a hospital system contracted with United HealthCare Medicare how may this impact you?
- As the CFO for United HealthCare, how do you work to ensure your next two years of Medical Loss Ratios are where they should be? What needs to happen? And what do you need to do?
- What would you advise a grandparent considering this payer for insurance coverage?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!