MCO204 Strategic Management Term Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
MCO204 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Midterm Task brief
Task:
The midterm is an individual task, and will be released in week 1 of the course.
Students are required to pick a company of their choice and develop a Professional Strategic Analysis Report, report should be 3,000 words, excluding Title, Abstract, Table of contents, Bibliography and Appendices.
Students are required to develop a comprehensive strategic management analysis of an organization of their choice, and conduct independent research focusing on the key developments inside and outside the case organization. The study should not stretch back beyond 5 years.
Written report should be remitted with EU Business School standard cover page.
Formalities:
- Wordcount: 000 words (+/-10%).
- Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total slide count.
- Font: Arial, size 12.5.
- Text alignment: Justified.
- The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Submission: Week (4) – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Submission deadline Feb 7, 2021, 23:59
Weight: This task is a 40% of your total grade for this subject.
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
- Outcome 1: Understanding and analysis of the challenges related to companies’ management, and the practicalities of operations.
- Outcome 2: Ability to apply relevant solutions to the challenges related to planning and decision making.
- Outcome 3: Ability to think out of the box as a global strategist and look for innovative solutions to boost your company’s business performance.
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69 Knowledge & Student demonstrates Student demonstrates Student understands the Student understands the task Understanding excellent understanding good understanding and task and provides minimum and attempts to answer the (30%) and analysis of the analysis of the complexities theory on the complexities question but does not complexities associated to associated to the associated to the mention enough theory on the consequences of consequences of consequences of the complexities associated management action in management action in management action in to the consequences of relation to the relation to the relation to the management action in development and development and development and relation to the development implementation of implementation of implementation of and implementation of corporate strategy and in corporate strategy and in corporate strategy and in corporate strategy and in dealing with the dealing with the dealing with the dealing with the implications implications of implications of implications of of management decisions management decisions and management decisions and management decisions and uses minimum amount uses vocabulary in an demonstrates use of the and/or some use of of relevant vocabulary. entirely appropriate relevant vocabulary. vocabulary. manner. Application (25%) Student applies fully Student applies mostly Student applies some Student applies little relevant relevant knowledge of the relevant knowledge of the relevant knowledge of the knowledge of the challenges challenges related to the challenges related to the challenges related to the related to the management management of companies management of companies management of companies of companies and the and the practicalities of and the practicalities of and the practicalities of practicalities of operations, operations, delivered in operations, delivered in operations, delivered in delivered in class. class. class. class. Misunderstanding Misunderstands are evident. may be evident. Critical Thinking Student critically assesses Student critically assesses Student provides some Student makes little or none (30%) in excellent ways, and in good ways, and insights but stays on the critical thinking insights, does appreciates the perspective appreciates the perspective surface of the topic. not quote appropriate of management from the of management from the References and sources sources, authors, and does role of general manager. role of general manager. may not be relevant. not provide valid sources. Communication Student communicates Student communicates Student communicates Student communicates their (25%) their ideas extremely their ideas clearly and their ideas with some ideas in a somewhat unclear clearly and concisely, concisely, respecting words clarity and concision. It and unconcise way. Does not respecting words count, count, grammar and may be slightly over or reach or does exceeds words grammar and spellcheck. spellcheck. under the words count count excessively and
limit. Some misspelling misspelling errors are errors may be evident. evident.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!