McDonald’s Revolutionizes Menu for Global Expansion
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
McDonald’s Revolutionizes Menu for Global Expansion
McDonald’s change process in the provision of food varieties has evolved over the years and is now consistent in its supply for over 100 countries with more than 40,000 outlets serving millions of clients daily. The fast-food giant came up with a new product launch to cater to the increasing number of people who do not eat meat. The stakeholders involved in the change process include the array of clients to be catered to, investors, suppliers, and community groups in general. New suppliers will be engaged in the process of food supply to make the ‘McPlant’. The change is relevant in the organization as it impacts the inclusiveness of customers, increased product scope, and increased revenue (Medne & Lapina,2019). This is a first-order change since it involves an ongoing process that can be reversed and is transformational as well as leads to the significant introduction of a new product at McDonald’s.
In the process of initiating change to bring in the ‘McPlant’ in McDonald’s, Kotter’s model of planning, implementation, and sustenance can play a key role in ensuring the change is made effectively. This way, McDonald’s can ensure that the situation had a sense of urgency, in that it was needed to cater to the needs of other clients. In terms of their preparation, McDonald’s should create a guiding coalition before initiating the process. The next step is to create a strategic vision for the goal followed by initiating a change in communication and removing other barriers to change such as equipping adequate machinery and adding employees in the preparation for another food supply (Ballaro et al,2020). McDonald’s management should consider another step which is the creation of short-term wins to monitor the success rate of the new project. Change should also be a continuous process where the company can consistently put into the project and finally initiate the new project into functionality and meet the organizational culture.
As an HR professional, I would contribute greatly to ensuring McDonald’s change process is met and that the organization can navigate easily through the whole process, and that it is possible to introduce ‘McPlant’ to the market. This way, I could provide initial employee communication concerning the need and plan for change among McDonald’s employees and engaging training programs to initiate the process. Consequently, the two steps would impact a successful shift in the process of introducing a vegan meal to serve the intended population.
Process change within an organization involves several stakeholders which impacts a clear understanding of the whole process and what is needed to meet the end goal. In one way or another, an expectation of what is needed to initiate the change can be done through applying the eight stages of Kotter to plan, implement and sustain change by itself as McDonald’s plans to introduce McPlant into its product portfolio. As an HR professional, I would help the company achieve its plans by initiating communication about the change to the employees and setting aside time for training concerning the same. This guarantees success in the introduction of the new product by McDonald’s to serve a wider population and increase its revenues.
McDonald’s Revolutionizes Menu for Global Expansion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!