Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
MBA642 T3 2020 Assessment 01 v03 Project Initiation Planning and Execution.
project intiation, planning and excution
Assessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment 1 Information
Subject Code: MBA642 Subject Name: Project Initiation, Planning and Execution Assessment Title: Project Analysis Assessment Type: Length:
Individual, Written Report 1600 words (+/- 10% allowable range)
Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission:
100 Online
Due Date: Week 5
Your task Individually, you are required to prepare a 1600 word report in which you are to analyse the success and failure factors of a major Australian project by considering its ethical compromises.
Assessment Description. In this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to analyse the organisational factors that promote effective project management. The success and failure factors, along with ethical considerations for each of the 5 IPECC phases, will need to be considered. Assessment Instructions Please choose one of the following projects as the basis for your research (For your chosen project you are to focus on the construction and implementation of the project, following the IPECC phases, and not its current operations beyond what is required in closure).
Design and Implementation of My Health Record Establishing the MacArthur Wind Farm Construction of the Adelaide Desalination Plant Wille Creek Mine Regeneration Project
Construction of Optus Stadium
Please note that the above links are provided to give only an initial outline of what the project delivered, and substantial additional research will be required to complete your assessment successfully. Once you have conducted thorough research about your chosen project, you are then required to prepare a 1600 word report in which you are to:
• Analyse in detail both the steps critical for your chosen project’s success and the critical pitfalls that could have lead to its failure. Relate the specific success and fail factors to your nominated project and do not just describe a generic theory or simple definitions.
http://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/
http://www.agl.com.au/about-agl/how-we-source-energy/macarthur-wind-farm
https://www.acciona.com.au/projects/water/desalination-plants/adelaide-desalination-plant/
https://minerals.org.au/sites/default/files/17_AUS%20Rehabilitation%20factsheet_Final%20low%20res.pdf
https://optusstadium.com.au/
Assessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
• For each of 5 IPECC stages, you are to analyse the success and failure factors for each of those stages. You are required to analyse at least one success criteria and at least one failure criteria for each stage. If you are unable to identify success or fail criteria for a particular stage, you are required to postulate at least one criteria; but it must be based on sound theory and your knowledge of the case study.
• Integrate the ethical considerations into each of these steps and show how ethical considerations may impact the success or failure of the chosen project.
In preparing this report, you will need to use at least 10 sources of information and reference these in accordance with the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your proposal. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Submission This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the problem and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.
Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” Policy.
Number of days
Penalty
1* – 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available
10 – 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after
the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s).
Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Assessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions: https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.MBA642 Assessment 1 Marking Rubric – Project Analysis 30% Marking Criteria (__/100)
F (Fail) 0 – 49%
P (Pass) 50 – 64%
C (Credit) 65 – 74%
D (Distinction) 75 – 84%
HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100%
Analysis of the success factors __/20 marks
You have provided an unclear or incoherent analysis of the success factors that do not consider each of
IPECC stages and/or does not relate to the chosen project.
You have provided a generic analysis of the success factors
in each of 5 IPECC stages which somewhat relates to the
chosen project.
You have provided a mostly detailed analysis of the success
factors in each of 5 IPECC stages which mostly relates to
the chosen project.
You have provided a detailed analysis of the success factors
in each of 5 IPECC stages which specifically relates to the
chosen project.
You have provided a comprehensive analysis of the
success factors in each of 5 IPECC stages which specifically
relates to the chosen project. Analysis of the fail factors __/20 marks
You have provided an unclear or incoherent analysis of the fail
factors that do not consider each of IPECC stages and/or does not
relate to the chosen project.
You have provided a generic analysis of the fail factors in
each of 5 IPECC stages which somewhat relates to the chosen
project.
You have provided a mostly detailed analysis of the fail factors in each of 5 IPECC
stages which mostly relates to the chosen project.
You have provided a detailed analysis of the fail factors in
each of 5 IPECC stages which specifically relates to the chosen
project.
You have provided a comprehensive analysis of the fail factors in each of 5 IPECC
stages which specifically relates to the chosen project.
Ethical Considerations __/20 marks
You have provided an unclear or incoherent analysis of the ethical
considerations that do not consider each of IPECC stages and/or does
not relate to the chosen project.
You have provided a generic analysis of the ethical
considerations in each of 5 IPECC stages which somewhat
relates to the chosen project.
You have provided a mostly detailed analysis of the ethical
considerations in each of 5 IPECC stages which mostly
relates to the chosen project.
You have provided a detailed analysis of the ethical
considerations in each of 5 IPECC stages which specifically
relates to the chosen project.
You have provided a comprehensive analysis of the
ethical considerations in each of 5 IPECC stages which
specifically relates to the chosen project.
Research __/10 marks
Your research lacks focus and/or you have chosen unsuitable or
bogus sources, which do not link to the required assessment task.
You have demonstrated a basic level of research, which is supported by a reasonable selection of primary and/or
secondary sources.
You have demonstrated substantial research, which is
supported by a reasonable selection of primary and
secondary sources.
You have demonstrated substantial research, which is supported by an appropriate
selection and range of primary and secondary sources.
You have demonstrated extensive research, which is supported by an appropriate
selection and range of primary and secondary sources.
Grammar/Spelling __/10 marks
Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect. It impacts on
the flow and readability of your analysis.
Though there are some errors in grammar and spelling, these do not detract from the readability
and flow of your analysis.
Mostly correct grammar and spelling but any errors do not impact on the readability and
flow of your analysis.
Errors in grammar and spelling are rare, which enhances the readability and flow of your
analysis.
Perfect grammar and spelling throughout, which enhances the
readability and flow of your analysis.
Format __/10 marks
The format chosen for your report is inappropriate and/or lacks thought and consideration for the intended
audience.
The format chosen for your report is appropriate, but further attention to detail would improve
its presentation.
The format chosen for your report is appropriate, but minor
changes would enhance its presentation.
Your report is professionally presented and has been
submitted in the appropriate format.
Your report is professionally presented and exceeds
expectations for what is suitable for a business environment.
In-text Citations and Referencing __/10 marks
Neither in-text referencing and reference list adhere to Kaplan
Harvard Referencing Style.
In-text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing
Style, with some errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to
Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with only occasional minor
errors.
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere
strictly to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with no
errors. Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!