MBA 673 the Adoption of New Technologies in Health Management Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
MBA 673 the Adoption of New Technologies in Health Management Essay
MBA 673, Adoption, New, Technologies, Health, Management, Essay
- What do you think is the main reason CIOs are becoming a bigger part of the strategic mission of healthcare organizations? Be sure that you justify your answer using content from the “CIOs and the Future of IT” article this week.
I’ll also be looking to see if you can make connections between this article and our other healthcare readings, especially the interview with a healthcare CIO in “How Digital Transformation Is Making Health Care Safer, Faster and Cheaper”. This answer should not just be your opinions, but should be justified by the reading.
- Discuss any connections you see between the issues addressed in the Putting Humans at the Center of Healthcare Innovation article and the recommendations of Nick Carr in IT Doesn’t Matter.
Would Carr be surprised by the findings related to what works around technology in healthcare? How would his “New Rules for IT” help predict or explain the findings of the authors of Putting Humans at the Center of Healthcare Innovation? Be sure you’re using the content in the article to justify your opinions and ideas.
- Read about the “SmartWatch project” article in the WSJ readings section on Moodle.First, evaluate this project based on Carr’s “new rules for IT”. Do you feel the project respects these rules or breaks them? Do you think this project qualifies as Human-Centered Healthcare innovation?
Why or why not. In justifying your answer, be sure to use evidence from the Putting Humans at the Center of Healthcare Innovation article. Finally, discuss where would you place this project within the digital strategy initiatives in the Digital Transformation in Healthcare article?
- In discussing his firm’s digital strategies in “How Digital Transformation Is Making Health Care Safer, Faster and Cheaper”, chief information officer of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dr. John Halamka, provides a nice overview of many topics we will touch on in the coming weeks. Choose ONE of these strategies and expand on what is mentioned in the article with your own research.
Specifically, you might address questions such as: how is this strategy being implemented across the healthcare industry? Who are the main companies offering these solutions, and what are the main challenges. Mention the regulatory factors driving these changes and anything else you think relevant. (Note: I don’t want you to go down the rabbit hole and write 10 pages about this. Three or four good paragraphs should be sufficient.)
- Smartwatch Project Cuts Health Costs
Kaiser Permanente is expanding a program in which patients recovering from a cardiac event wear smartwatches to track whether they are exercising and taking their medication.
The hospital and health-insurance company, based in Oakland, Calif., said the rehab program, in which patients participate remotely, is showing promising results. Kaiser is betting on remote monitoring via wearables to cut costs in areas such as hospital readmissions.
More than 2,300 patients recovering from a cardiac event enrolled in the remote eight-week rehab program between June 2018 and June 2019, according to a paper published in NEJM Catalyst. More than 87% of the patients completed it, compared with less than 50% on average for Kaiser’s in-clinic rehab programs, the company said.
Readmission rates based on cardiac-related conditions in the remote program were less than 2% through June 2019, compared with 10% to 15% on average for in-clinic programs. The program, which started in Southern California, has continued since June 2019 and is expanding to more states.
The patients have been wearing Samsung Electronics Co. smartwatches supplied by Kaiser for the duration of the program.
Users receive reminders on the smartwatch to do things such as work out or take medication. A mobile app accessible through the smartwatch includes a questionnaire where patients provide details including the type and duration of exercise and whether they experienced any symptoms. The watch collects additional data such as steps and pulse.
The program supplied around 4,000 Samsung smartwatches to patients by the end of 2019. In 2020, the company expects to add about 5,000 patients who suffered cardiac events, which include heart attacks, bypass surgery and heart failure.
Kaiser Permanente also is talking to companies such as Apple Inc., whose Apple Watch has apps to monitor and notify patients of irregular heart rhythm.
“We see that as an opportunity and an area that we need to continue to monitor and determine which devices have the right efficacy so that we can rely on the data,” said Dick Daniels, chief information officer at Kaiser Permanente.
Pilot projects involving health-care wearables for remote monitoring have been deployed by a third of 100 health-care providers surveyed by Spyglass Consulting Group, according to a study released in October.
Technology companies, meanwhile, are looking to expand in the health-care market. Google recently acquired Fitbit Inc., which has a wearables program for health providers. The Food and Drug Administration is working with sellers of wearables, including Apple and Samsung, to streamline approval of mobile medical apps.
Concerns about the accuracy and security of data collected by wearables has led to resistance from some health-care providers in using the devices. A study by Stanford University published in March found that the pulse sensor in the Apple Watch helped detect a heart-rhythm disorder in some users but may have caused false alarms for others.
In Kaiser’s virtual-rehab program, data collected by wearable sensors play a supporting role to the app the patients use. Kaiser and Samsung worked together to customize a version of Samsung’s HeartWise app to remind patients of program goals and deliver their responses to physicians.
The program includes exercise regimens, counseling and other steps to improve a patient’s health and lifestyle.
“This one is not continuous monitoring. But it’s almost as though somebody’s calling you every day, all the time, to see what’s going on,” said Tad Funahashi, Kaiser’s chief innovation and transformation officer for Southern California, who led the program’s development.
If a patient isn’t meeting obligations, such as failing to exercise for a specific amount of time, health-care providers can follow up with phone calls or during in-clinic sessions. The alerts are triggered by information provided by the user. Data including step counts and heart rate to check exertion are available to doctors or nurses through a dashboard on Kaiser’s system so they can review and adjust the rehabilitation program.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
MBA 673 the Adoption of New Technologies in Health Management Essay
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!