Participation & Promptness |
|
|
|
0 |
Final Report (From rubric) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation of Final project (From rubric) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Report Rubric |
|
Weight |
Excellent |
Fair |
Poor |
% |
Score |
% |
90-100% |
75-89% |
0-74% |
|
|
Theoretical Content
|
|
The research objectives are clear with a thorough literature review. The theoretical framework is suitable for the study |
The project’s objectives are presented and appear significant. Support from literature is limited. |
The project’s objectives are missing or incomplete. Previous studies do not support the study |
|
0 |
Research Instrument
|
0 |
The instrument is valid and can effectively meet all research objectives |
The mode of conducting the study is appropriate but could be refined to better meet objectives |
The research method and instrument are questionable |
0 |
0 |
Data Collection and Analysis
|
0 |
Data is sufficient and was collected through appropriate means. Student has made good use of the available data and analysis reflects rigor. |
Some errors in data collection are evident. Analysis is detailed aids understanding. |
Data collected is insufficient and analyses does not fulfill the purpose of the research |
0 |
0 |
Reporting of Results and Discussion
|
0 |
Findings of the research are summarized using appropriate figures. The report gives valid inferences and acknowledges limitations |
The research meets all major objectives and enough detail is presented to draw conclusions |
The explanation is sufficiently inaccurate, incomplete, or confusing |
0 |
0 |
Conclusions and Recommendations
|
0 |
Conclusion relates well to the findings and gives future direction. Recommendations are made using appropriate models, or theories. |
Conclusion is objective and valid. Student has sufficiently met all research objectives. |
Poor conclusion or summary of arguments. All research questions are not answered. |
0 |
0 |
Writing Mechanics
|
0 |
The report is well written and follows all formatting guidelines. Appropriate citations and appendices support the document |
The report adheres to guidelines while the quality of the written work remains average |
Errors in sentence structure and grammar with improper citations |
0 |
0 |
Presentation of Final project
|
0 |
Introduces the topic clearly and creatively. Maintains clear focus on the topic. Effectively includes smooth transitions to connect key points. Ends with logical, effective and relevant conclusion. |
Introduces the topic. Somewhat maintains focus on the topic. Includes some transitions to connect key points. Ends with a conclusion based On evidence |
Does not clearly introduce the topic. Does not establish or maintain focus on the topic. Uses ineffective transitions that rarely connect points. Ends without a conclusion. |
0 |
0 |
Ethical standards for conducting research (CLO2) |
0 |
The student demonstrates adherence to the responsible conduct of research through appropriate application of relevant discipline-specific procedures, protocols, and ethical guidelines. There is no evidence of plagiarism and others’ work is cited appropriately. |
The student articulates awareness of activities necessary for responsible conduct of research but does not follow through on application of discipline-specific procedures, protocols, and ethical guidelines. There may be minor oversights in terms of cited work. |
Students will demonstrate awareness of the responsible conduct of research. The student vaguely articulates
awareness of activities necessary for responsible conduct of research. There is no evidence of application of appropriate procedures, protocols, and ethical guidelines. There is evidence of plagiarism and/or inappropriate use of others’ work. |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
is new, unique, surprising; shows a personal
touch |
Has some new ideas or improvements |
Relies on existing models, ideas, or
directions; it is not new or unique |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
55% of the final grade |
|
0 |