Marketing Matrix: For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Health Care Organizations
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Marketing Matrix: For-Profit and Not-For-Profit Health Care Organizations
Contrast between For-profit and not-for profit healthcare organizations
Aspect of Comparison For-profit health care organization Not-for profit health care organization Level of centralization For profit healthcare is majorly decentralized and decisions are made by individuals under the authority of directors and other employees in the managerial positions. The implementation of policies is not subject to the approval of those in senior managerial positions (Eiland, 2015). There is lack of uniformity in policies implemented in various subsidiaries of for-profit healthcare organizations. There is a high centralization of decision making in which subsidiary hospitals are not permitted to formulate policies affecting their activities without the approval of agencies such as regulatory bodies, government departments, or healthcare secretaries. There is consistency of policies affecting practices in all not-for profit organizations. Levels of Access to capital markets There is low chance of access to capital market due to restrictions and barriers to private firms that operate for-profit healthcare organizations. The operators of for-profit health care organizations have to comply with a number of terms and conditions before accessing loans, grants, or bonds for improvement of their services (Paul III, Godby, Saldanha, Valle & Coustasse, 2016). The likelihood or the ability to access the capital markets funds is high due to few restrictions. Most not-for profit organizations also get loans and grants at subsidized interest rates (Shugarman, Nicosia & Schuster, 2007). A significant amount of funds for operation are provided by the government. Strategic marketing differences The marketing activities focus on improving the welfare of the organizations such as high returns on investments, increase in the number of patients who seek their services, and increased market share. The strategic marketing activities are aimed at achieving a competitive advantage over other health care providers in a region. Marketing is done using private funds. The strategic marketing activities are focused on increasing public health quality such as by increasing accessibility to healthcare services. Marketing activities are also aimed to promoting the affordability of health care services provided to residents of lower economic status in order to improve their health. Marketing is usually done using public funds. Quality Attributes The quality of services is usually high due to the need to increase competitiveness and comply with the quality standards expected of a health care organization (Shugarman, Nicosia & Schuster, 2007). The quality of services is also high because most organizations aim at achieving customer satisfaction and retention. The quality of services is usually not high when compared with for-profit health care services because of lack of profit drive and lack of accountability. Most employees of not-for profit health care services provide their services with the objective of improving access to health care services without necessarily improving the quality of treatment, medication, or patient education services (Eiland, 2015). Management of pricing and volume The pricing is usually high and patients have to incur high cost to access services such as careening, treatment, and medications. The high cost of treatment is due to the fact that for-profit health care organizations incur high cost of operation such as taxes and licensing fees which has an impact on their profitability (Paul III et al., 2016). Management of volume is achieved by the expansion of a medical facility or increasing the number of staffs. The pricing is comparatively low and most services are provided free of charge. The payments for staffs are usually high and most employees feel satisfied with their earnings. The management of volume is achieved by increasing funding for the construction of more healthcare facilities.
MARKETING MATRIX 4
References
Eiland, M. R. (2015). Differences Between For-Profit and Nonprofit Hospitals: Perceived Quality and Access (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Paul III, D. P., Godby, T., Saldanha, S., Valle, J., & Coustasse, A. (2016). Quality of care and profitability in not-for-profit versus for-profit nursing homes.
Shugarman, L. R., Nicosia, N., & Schuster, C. R. (2007). Comparing For-Profit and Not-for- Profit Health Care Providers.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!