Market Effects on Compensation Philosophy in Various Ways
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Market Effects on Compensation Philosophy in Various Ways
Milestone Four
11/28/2021
Milestone Four
At Maersk the utilized compensation philosophy is the industrial compensation philosophy. This type of compensation philosophy encompasses the classification of employees based on various job groups. Job groups in employment are made based on level of academic qualification, work experience or work position at the work place. Hence with each promotion or rank at the work place the employees get to have higher job group hence increased compensation and better work environment. Hence this establishes a culture where people increase their work ethics, performance and hard work to increase their job group. Hence the job group is the primary factor in job compensation at Maersk (Groysberg and Abbott, 2012).
The market can affect the compensation philosophy in various ways. When determining to increase or reduce the compensation of particular employees, the performance of a particular period comes in handy. Here by gauging the current market performance for a quarter or annual company performance the business can decide to reduce or increase the salaries for the particular job groups. With increased performance and returns for the business it becomes possible to come up with salary increase. If the performance is low the persons job group is reduced hence the compensation is negatively affected hence the market directly affects the compensation.
Salary surveys to an organization are crucial as they determine whether a particular organization will be able to pay for certain positions and job groups. Salary surveys work through trying to collect information about employee salaries and benefits. The different surveys are available across different industries, jobs, religions, and organizations. Hence by getting information of the compensation structure for different countries and organizations based on specific professions, it becomes possible to know how to fairly compensate and reward one’s own employees. Through surveys information obtained gives the employees chance to work for what is their worth and be able to receive the most suited salary.
Salary surveys also help organizations in the setting and establishment of salary structures within the organization (MARS, 2021). Having an organization where an employee gets paid same as their manager may result in work conflict and disrespect. Hence for there to be a well-established work role and obligation structure it is crucial that all the employees are paid based on the organization and role structure. Through salary surveys for other organizations and businesses out there makes it easy to establish and easily manage employee payments. Hence it is makes it easy to manage and establish the right compensation for the workers within the organization.
Discretion for any business allows for businesses to come up ways to cut on unnecessary costs. Discretion benefits entails to allowing of employees to make a personalized package that meets their specific needs. Hence with discretion benefits it becomes possible for employees to choose the package that best describes and suits them. Hence employees get to have their individual preference. Additionally, such preference allows for people to be comfortable with the organization compensation structure. This makes Maersk one of the best suited work places employees all around the world.
Another key importance of the benefits of discretion to an organization is the capability to attract professional and well- suited employees for posts within the organization (UBC insurance solutions, 2021). Hence through discretion the business will be able not to lose employees to other organizations but attract the best employees suited for particular jobs in the business. People tend not to be limited to particular compensations hence discretions will give a chance for people to select different cuts on their compensations such as insurance and retirements deductions. Hence some people would not want some deductions or pay privately from such deductions. Hence, this gives employees some freedom over their compensation.
Reference
MARS, (2021) Salary surveys: Compensation for employees. Retrieved from https://learn.marsdd.com/article/salary-surveys-compensation-for-employees/
UBC insurance solutions (2021) what are the discretionary benefits and should you consider them? Retrieved from https://www.ubcinsurance.com/what-are-discretionary-benefits-and-should-you-consider-them/
Groysberg, B. O. R. I. S., & Abbott, S. (2012). AP Møller-Maersk Group: evaluating strategic talent management initiatives. Harvard Bus Sch Case, 2012, 412-147.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!