Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Study: Managing Health Care Professionals
Sharon B. Buchbinder and Dale Buchbinder
You can pick one of these with an extended response or each of the six cases with a brief description of how you might resolve the issue with a clear identification of the major area of concern.
1. You are a new administrator at Jonestown Medical Center. You receive a
telephone call from the nurse manager of the emergency room. Dr. Smith,
An emergency room physician who is an employee of your hospital, has just
reported for duty. The nurse manager suspects that Dr. Smith is intoxicated.
What do you do?
2. You are the CEO of Sleepy Hollow Retirement Community and Nursing
Center. A resident’s family has come to you to complain that their loved one,
who is on pain medication, is in intolerable pain. Her medications appear not
to be working anymore. One of the family members states, “My 90-year-old
mother saw the nurse put the pain medicine in her pocket.” What do you do?
3. You are the practice manager of Docs R Us, Ltd., a large multispecialty
medical practice employing more than 100 physicians. You are conducting
a random review of billing for doctors in the practice and you discover that one
of the internists in your group who treats mostly Medicare recipients has
been checking off the wrong code for her procedures on the billing form.
The procedures on the patient record do not match the billing form codes.
You pull up her files for the past three months and find a pattern of upcoding.
When you meet with her to review this miscoding, she becomes very
defensive and angry. What do you do? How could you have prepared better
for the meeting with the physician?
4. You are the assistant director of the hospital medical staff office at the Rural
Outreach Community Hospital in a tiny town in Arkansas. It is your job to
verify physician credentials for staff privileges. Your hospital receives an
application from a physician for staff privileges. On his application, it states
that he graduated from medical school in El Salvador. When you call to
verify this, you are told that the medical school burned down two years ago
, and all the records were destroyed. What do you do?
5. You are a new administrator at a hospital well known for pulmonary
medicine. The physicians in the ICU, the ER, and the department of
pulmonary medicine have demanded to meet with you about the shortage of
respiratory therapists. You stall them for 48 hours so you can gather data.
What types of information will you need to collect to have an intelligent?
conversation with this powerful group of physicians?
6. Dr. White ordered an unusual dose of a medication. May Patterson, RN,
635 sees the order and believes it to be the wrong dose. She calls Dr. White, who
insists that she give the medication—as written. Nurse Patterson calls you,
the administrator on call for the weekend, to resolve this crisis. What do you
do?Mini-Case Studies for Chapter 11 p. 529-530
Buchbinder, S. B., & Shanks, N. H. (Eds.). (2017). Introduction to Health Care Management. Retrieved from https://studydaddy.com/attachment/136335/IntroductiontoHealthCareManagement.pdf
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!