Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Management Information Systems and Technology Applications
Management, Information, Systems, Technology, Applications
APA format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
- define and describe the concept of data explosion
- discuss Thomas davenport’s assertion that analytics are source of sustainable competitive advantage. Provide examples from your research or experience of organization’s that have realized competitive advantage through analytics
- Management information systems and technology. Written assignment.
Submit a paper which is 3-4 pages in length (no more than 4-pages), exclusive of the reference page. Paper should be double-spaced in times new roman (or its equivalent) font which is no greater than 12 points in size. The paper should cite at least three sources in apa format. One source can be your textbook, if applicable.
- develop a case report for the netflix case using case report rubric and guidelines
- case report must integrate your concepts along with the input of your peers from the discussion assignment conducted in the previous unit
- Strategic decision making and management. Discussion board.
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
- in this question, you will consider two theoretical views of an organization’s internal environment. First, explain the resource-based theory and its relevance to strategic management. Then, select one of the other theories (enactment, environmental determinism, institutional theory, or transaction cost economics) and compare and contrast it to the resource-based view. Which do you think best explains the internal environment? Why?
- Strategic decision making and management. Written assignment.
After reading the case “restoration affiliates,” reflect on the challenges of the organization. Build a value chain of the organization’s activities and identify the strongest and weakest link. Then, based on the information in the case, perform a swot analysis. Make sure that there are at least three strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats each.
Finally, based on your analysis of the value chain and swot, explain what is the most important strategic challenge or opportunity facing the firm and how it could be implemented.
Read the general guidelines for case studies and the case study rubric before beginning this paper.
Submit at least a 3-4-page case analysis, (independent of the title page and reference page) double-spaced in times new roman (or its equivalent) font which is no greater than 12 points in size. Paper and all citations should be in apa format.
- Strategic decision making and management. Portfolio activity.
At least 2 pages. Apa format. Cite your sources. No plagiarism.
This week we learned about the swot analysis. Reflect on how you might do a swot on your own abilities. For example, what internal personal strengths and weaknesses do you have? What external opportunities and threats are there for you?
For each strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat, can you find one which you discovered through your coursework thus far? After viewing the completed swot, what conclusions can you draw about your professional goals? Are they in alignment with the swot?
- Human resources management. Discussion board.
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
- using your own job (current or past) and briefly discuss how your performance was managed and evaluated.
- using your experience, consider the three most important job duties and design three (3) objectives or measurements using the smart method.
- once you’ve done this, discuss your experience using this method. Did you find it difficult? Why or why not?
- Human resources management. Written assignment.
Submit a 2-3 page paper, exclusive of the reference page and double-spaced. The paper should cite sources independent of the textbook.
Theorists from multiple disciplines have significantly contributed to the development of modern-day management attitudes and practices. Among those theorists include mayo, maslow, hertzberg, and mcgregor.
- spend some time researching the above theorists and then choose the theory you find most relevant for developing your personal management style
- identify the characteristics of an effective performance management system and explain how the theory that you find most relevant deals with those characteristics. Discuss how your management style jives with an effective performance management
System.
- finally, discuss what you believe to be the most important characteristics of an effective coach or mentor and why you believe these characteristics to be the most critical. Discuss how these characteristics are supported in the literature.
Assessment criteria
- papers will be assessed on how well the each of the above bullet points are addressed
- paper organization and clarity
- use of research
- Managing projects and programs. Discussion board.
Apa format. Always cite your sources. References list in alphabetical order. At least 300 words, include conclusion at the end. No plagiarism.
Read the article emotional intelligence predicts job performance: the 7 traits that help managers relate (http://www.forbes.com/sites/sebastianbailey/2015/03/05/emotional-intelligence-predicts-job-performance-the-7-traits-that-help-managers-relate/) and discuss the following topics:
- the article summarizes the main results of a study on the relationship between emotional intelligence and job performance and describes key traits that influence performance. As a project manager, you are responsible for the most effective use of your resources, including human resources. How do you factor in the emotional intelligences (their presence and absence) among your team members? Is it possible? In you do not think so, explain why. If you believe you can explain what you would do to take advantage of it.
- the author suggests that there has been some debate as to whether ei is something that can be developed or whether a person just ‘has’ it. What do you think? Explain your position.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!