“Losing Earth: A Recent History” Book Review
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
“Losing Earth: A Recent History” Book Review
Subject: Geography
Topic: Book Review
Paper details:
The book to be reviewed is “Losing Earth: A Recent History” by Nathaniel Rich. Details of the review: A book review ideally should contain three major elements – description, analysis and appraisal. Any reviewer’s primary duty is to describe the book. The review reader wants to know how big a book it is. Is it a slim volume, really just a long essay; or is it a monumental tome? The contents should be described sufficiently so that the reader can obtain a clear idea about the book’s subject. This will probably involve not only a description of the various parts of the book, but some indication also of the amount of space allotted to the various topics. The reader of your review should be informed about the tone of the work. For what kind of audience is it intended? An indication of the character and quantity of supplements to the text is appropriate here, such as mention of any photographs, diagrams, maps, bibliography, index, etc. With a clear picture of the book established in the reader’s mind, the reviewer should turn to analysis. Analysis is often the weakest feature of most book reviews. Every author deserves (unless unwarranted) a sympathetic, appreciative analysis of the book she or he wrote; but too few get it. Many reviewers concentrate on the author’s mistakes and discuss the book that “should” have been written First, analyze a book on the author’s terms. Make clear what the author’s objectives were, what was attempted. Point out explicitly what devices the author uses to achieve her or his objectives. Accentuate the positive. Make clear what is learned from reading or using the book. Explain how the book is best used. After the book’s utility is made clear, its shortcomings may be exposed. When criticizing, be fair. Do not weasel. The objective of the book review is to provide information about the book, not the reviewer. Stick to the subject – the contents of the book under review. After completing the analysis, appraise the volume. One fair and practical way is to compare it to other books on the same or similar subject. What topics does it treat those previous treatments of the subject did not? What does it omit? Be judicious; make clear the basis for your opinion. Length: Your review has a ceiling of 6 pages and a floor of 5.5 pages of text (only 11- or 12- point font No title page – bibliographic information discussed below will be at the top of your first page of text. Format: Book reviews feature different “standard” formats for academic and professional journals. You are not expected to include the price of the book, as you may not know it. However, if you do, please include the book’s price. All other relevant bibliographic information – author, title, publisher, year, pages, International Standard Book Number (ISBN) must be included at the top of the first page of your review. Originality: Feeling creative? You are strongly encouraged to include an original title for your review,
SHOW LESS
SHOW LESS
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!