Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
This paper will focus on the treatment strategies and prevention efforts that are available for the Leukemia. There is always something to say about prevention although it may not be in the “traditional” perspective of prevention (i.e. disease prevention). You may need to think about prevention in terms of disease recurrence or symptom management.
SUBMIT: A WORD file that address the requirements noted above through this link. Follow APA guidelines and include a cover page and reference list.
Follow APA guidelines and include citations and references in your discussion board posts and journal entries.
Follow APA guidelines and include citations and references in your discussion board posts and journal entries.
Requirements
- SUBMIT: A WORD file that address the requirements noted above through this link. Follow APA guidelines and include a cover page and reference list.
- Paper should reflect a synthesis of the available information uncovered in your search of the literature and utilize APA formatting (e.g., title page, in-text citations, reference list). Minimize direct quotes pulled from your resources. Also, stick to reputable resources such as peer-reviewed journals, books and government websites (do not cite Wikipedia!).
To get maximum credit, assignments should:
- Meet the requirements outlined in the assignment
- Be written in APA format
- Show no evidence of plagiarism
- Show evidence of good critical thinking.
Please be sure to include your name (and the names of any other students, if a group project) on the assignment. Assignments should be formatted with 1″ margins all around, in 10 or 12 pt. font, double spaced.
Evaluation of your assignments will reflect the extent to which you’ve correctly applied principles of grammar, mechanics, punctuation, spelling, and effective sentence structure.
All communications should be written in your own words. Direct quotations should be kept to a minimum and used only when they enhance the message you are trying to convey. In all assignments, you are expected to appropriately cite the sources of ideas, facts and quotations using the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Manual of Style. Please note that this not only involves having a complete list of references at the end of the assignment, but also indicating within the body of the paper the sources of ideas, facts and quotations.
Rubric
Substance (5pts)
Substance for the second journal entry includes discussion of the diagnostic tool or screening test that is utilized within the treatment or assessment of the health condition you have chosen. Also, students should present an appraisal of the instrument, including a discussion of its strengths and weaknesses and its reported sensitivity and specificity (where applicable).
Understanding (2pts)
Understanding includes the demonstration of the comprehension of the major concepts discussed and the application of course material. Whenever possible, connect the information to the reading material of the course.
References (2pts)
References include the use of citations from peer-reviewed journals and other primary sources (i.e. textbook, books, etc). Government websites are also viable options especially CDC, Mayo Clinic, NIH and other well-established agencies; however these sources should be used sparingly. The journal entry should also include a reference list.
Mechanics (1pt) Citations and references should conform to American Psychological Association (6th Edition). The entry should also be free of grammatical and spelling errors.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!