Legal Ethics Responses Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Legal Ethics Responses Essay Assignment
Respond with 200 words each.
Rebecca – I do agree that in some instances the Government should have the ability to regulate information that is given to the public. However in my opinion I do not agree that news should be regulated. I believe that if a adult or child is watching the news then it should not be regulated.
That leads to Americans not fully understanding what is happening in the world around them. I believe we should know what is going on in the world without a filter. However on other things like radio broadcast or just a regular show, I do think needs some regulation.
You never know when a child may be just scrolling through channels and you want to trust that you do not have to stand over there in case you need to turn off the TV. Having kids myself I know they repeat a lot of what they hear. While some people do not see certain words as hateful or bad, other people will. You can raise your child however you want (within reason obviously) however people have to right to sensor their children. If they do not want them knowing certain things.
After listening to the broadcast of the Federal Appeals Court, I noticed a few things. Certain things should not be said on TV however we have things in place to help if some things slip out. This includes the little “bleep” noise that happens if someone curses or says something vulgar.
The only problem is that is not always fast enough since some TV shows/segments are live. That is where the issue came in with Fox. They did win the appeal which shocked a lot of people. I agree that sometimes you forget when you can and can not say certain things. I know it is hard not to curse around the kids and sometimes I slip. I agree that it would be smart to change some of the rules and regulations however like the broadcast said it will be hard with currently laws in place.
Nancy – Freedom of speech but…Right to be free but…Right to express but… Reading the constitution and see so many cases, so many issues as to the interpretation of it either by lawyers that are expert in interpreting it or Justice Judges that live for the constitution. It remains a code that need to crack and us the people are at the mercy of another human trying to interpret it and depend on how they feel that day, decide your fate.
Since the constitution was created, it always have different interpretation, thus, the meaning they attached to it. Article I and II keep overlapping with each other and although the system was created for check and balance in the surface, but deep down that is not what is being portrayed.
In this case regarding regulated information that is given to the public, in one side I would say that regulating what is being showed or said in broadcast radio and television could be a good thing as it says is to protect the younger viewers or listeners. However we can not say if it is true or not. If the government wanted to protect young audience as they said, they would not protect hateful speech in the first amendment.
As we read the first amendment, “Congress shall make no law … or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble….” while many countries ban hateful languages, the US government welcome it and protect it. So does that mean it is okay to teach young audience hate but they can not hear coarse languages? This part of the fence should not be left to US government but rather the state. The first amendment clearly stated that congress should NOT MAKE NO LAW. Why is it that they interfering in this matter?
Obscene language was never part of the first amendment and the government should not have the ability to regulate any “information”, information is the key word. The public deserve to know information. The government overreaching their authorities and it is unlawful or should we say unconstitutional to regulate the information giving to the public. I understand they saying that they doing it to protect the young audience, however it seems to me as a cover up to control the information that is going to the public.
In the case Miller v. California (1973) the judges was trying to put a meaning to what is obscene, under the Miller test, obscenity is something that appeals to deviants, breaks local or state laws, and lacks value. While freedom of the press and speech is an important aspect for the Bill of Rights, as all of the other amendment, that freedom is not absolute and open for the US Government to regulate. Thus, while I am against the government interfering with media information, however I could see how it is important for the government to regulate but I refuse to believe it is because of young audience.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!