Law Enforcement and Government Entities
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Law Enforcement and Government Entities
Technology has changed lives in fundamental and positive ways. It also has opened the door to new types of cybercrime, which can run the gamut from identity theft to organizing terrorist plots. As each new type of crime comes to light, usually through a case that draws national attention, law enforcement and government entities respond using increasingly sophisticated surveillance technology. Law enforcement’s use of technology to prevent and combat cybercrime has prompted even greater “advances” in criminal activity with the use of encryption, anonymizers, and proxy servers.
For the Final Project, you will provide an in-depth analysis of a cybercrime. You will select a cybercrime to use for the Final Project. You will then review how this type of crime evolved, how it gained national attention, and how it was influenced by technology. As you continue your analysis of the cybercrime, examine legislation, penalties, and how law enforcement might prevent and address the cybercrime.
The Assignment:
Write a 10- to 12-page paper (not counting the title page and References page) that includes the following elements:
Introduction:
Describe the type of cybercrime you selected.
Explain the evolution of the cybercrime, including when the cybercrime gained national attention and any circumstances or cases that might have prompted the national attention.
Explain how technology has influenced the evolution of the cybercrime.
Body:
Describe legislation related to the cybercrime.
Explain limitations and/or gaps related to the legislation.
Explain penalties in your state or country of residence for engaging in the cybercrime.
Explain the degree to which the penalties you identified are adequate for penalizing the offender.
Explain challenges law enforcement might face in efforts to prevent and address the cybercrime.
Conclusion:
Explain how law enforcement might utilize technological solutions to prevent and address the cybercrime.
Explain how law enforcement might utilize technology to benefit society and effect social change.
#PhD Level
#Unapproved
70
Week 7 Discussion 1
Discussion – Week 7
Top of Form
Discussion: Performance Management System – Evaluations
This week we will briefly review various aspects of performance management and feedback. A model is provided that is useful in linking performance management systems with organizational strategic objectives and goals. It is important to consider carefully who will do evaluations; specifically, what they will evaluate; how the evaluation will be administered; and appropriate measures of evaluation. Critical guidelines to effective performance systems suggest specific, immediate feedback based on clear, measurable goals delivered by a credible, trustworthy person are desirable.
Effective performance management systems require cooperation between employees and supervisors to set performance expectations; review results; assess organizational and individual needs, and plan. Today’s streamlined organizations have fewer employees with broader job assignments and increased responsibility and accountability. More than ever, organizations need broader measures of employee performance to ensure that performance deficiencies are quickly addressed with employee development programs; behaviors are being channeled toward specific objectives; and appropriate and specific feedback is provided to the employee to assist in career development.
Strategic Human Resource Management –
To prepare for this Discussion, pay particular attention to the following Learning Resources:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially:
Evaluation – Week 7 – See attachment
Evaluation Measures – See attachment
Social Responsibility, the SDGs and Human Resources – https://youtu.be/n_X9uJ2kgUk
Key Takeaway from Corporate Social Responsibilities – See “W6 Lecture” attachment
Assignment: –
Respond to two or more colleagues, “See listed below” in the following way:
Propose two suggestions on something your colleague can do in the future to positively change the behavior they identified.
Provide a rationale for your suggestions based on your experience and the Learning Resources for the week.
3 – 4 paragraphs
No plagiarism
APA citing
1st Colleagues – Tammy Girder
Tammy Girder
Week 7
Top of Form
The performance management system has several purposes and of its purposes is to facilitate employee development. It does this by addressing the things that employees need to sustain and improve in. It tells them their strengths and weaknesses. Another purpose is to provide the data that impacts the needs assessment for training and development. The performance management system is also used to determine rewards and compensation, and it is also use as a motivational tool. The performance management system is used to facilitate legal compliance and the final purpose is to facilitate the HR planning process.
I have been in the military for the last 26 years as we have a performance evaluation system for noncommissioned offers and officers. If the raters are honest on their evaluations of their Soldiers it can stop them from getting promoted and making the next rank. From what I have seen, most raters do not give their Soldiers a negative evaluation because they are not trying to hurt their career but they are hurting them in the long run rather they write a bad evaluation or not. They also have counseling statement that are supposed to be done to let a Soldier know where they are in their performance and this is done for Soldiers of all ranks. However, people have gotten lazy and have gotten away from doing any form of performance counseling and that is only hurting the Soldier and the supervisor in the long run, especially if they want to do any time of punishment when a Soldier does wrong. How can you punish someone when there isn’t a paper trail to inform that person of what they are doing wrong?
Performance evaluations are a good thing to do because it gives an accurate assessment of what the supervisor see in their employees and give the employee an opportunity to correct anything that is wrong and it will also give them guidance on how to fix what is wrong.
Bottom of Form
2nd Colleagues – Nina Smith
Nina Smith
DB7
Top of Form
This a system that is shared with management and employees to create a plan for performance improvement. They work in collaboration to create an action plan. Within this system, there are steps such as creating a goal, feedback and coaching, and then performance review and evaluation.
At my current job, they use this structure. Employee performance is checked so often. We have one on one meeting with our team leads weekly. This gives time to talk about our needs, strategizes, and vent if need be. This time is also for our team lead to answer questions and concerns but also talk about opportunities if there are any and coaching. Each month, we set a goal and review it at the end of the time frame to see if I am meeting those goals. If not, how do we strategize so that I am meeting those goals and if I am, what do I think is helping and are there areas of opportunity for growth. For me specifically I make the highest green time and sometimes call and talk time on my team. That means I am available to our students and I am actively engaged and helping them. The negative to this, is that I do not give myself any red time to do what I want such as join meetings I used to go to for DE&I topics, professional development, I stay on green for most of my not so important meetings which always turns into interruptions because I get an inbound call. So, though I am exceeding in these goals, there are still opportunities there for me to grow as a better employee and advisor and finding that balance. I am competitive. My team members do not worry about availability and they all take their breaks and do professional development and go to the meetings they want. They all make the required green time and a few are right under it. My competitiveness creates missed opportunities to work on professional development so that I can move up in position. I am due to possibly be promoted in July and professional development training is coming up for me in April. I have to learn and grow with these areas of opportunities my team lead has prevented me so I do not delay or miss an opportunity to be promoted.
Bottom of Form
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!