Las Vegas, Nevada Article Analysis of Aristotle on Improving One Character
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Question Description
1 recognizing and stating Muzio’s point of view. Understanding the article and stating what the article’s aim is, why did he write it, and what idea/point of view is he attempting to support 2 Identify the sources of evidence used by the author to support his argument or point of view: the references he cited. 3 Muzio’s argument implications: what are the conclusions, takeaways, and how can these discoveries be applied to academics, real life (business or social life), and/or policy? 4 Then, based on the author’s reasoning, indicate whether or not you agree with his notion, point of view, or hypothesis as a group. Why do you agree or disagree with Muzio’s argument/point of view?
The group will provide an argument about the essay Aristotle on Improving One’s Character in this critical analysis paper. The purpose is twofold: one, identify and explain the author’s (Muzio’s) critical argument, and two, present your own counter-argument to the author’s point. One of the most common problems with critical analysis papers is that students mistake it for a summary – it is neither a summary nor a book report. You are examining the author’s argument rather than presenting your own.
This task is designed to highlight the idea that, despite their high qualifications, authors are still advancing an argument and offering evidence—their goal is to persuade you that their argument is correct, not only to present facts. You must choose whether Muzio’s argument is compelling to you. The following are some crucial elements to consider while evaluating arguments:
Identify the main points made in the presentation.
Determine the author’s major point of view.
Determine what kind of proof or support was employed.
What do the ramifications of this argument look like?Task
There are two parts to your writing assignment:
Identify and explain the author’s (Muzio’s) important point of view.
Make a counter-argument to that argument.
This is a collaborative project.
The paper must be a group effort.
Only one of the group members must upload all submitted papers to the assignment URL on Canvas. Your group number must be included in the file name. The names of the members of the group are not to be published in the paper (The title page should only include your group number)
If a document does not match the aforementioned criteria, it is termed late.
Late papers will be graded according to the Late Submission Policy, which can be found in the syllabus.
Typed, double-spaced, 12-point font, one-inch margins, papers should be between 1500 and 2000 words long. There are no references in this paper.
References from peer-reviewed scholarly research should be used to back up your main ideas.
Your paper must have a similarity index of less than 20% to avoid plagiarism.RUBRIC ESSAY ON CRITICAL ANALYSIS
CATEGORY
Exceeds the Industry Standard
Meets the Requirements
Does Not Meet the Minimum Requirements
(Background History/Thesis Statement) INTRODUCTION and CONCLUSION
30% of the total
There is a well-developed beginning with an attention grabber that piques the reader’s interest and keeps them engaged until the thesis statement is reached. Your general point concerning the author’s reasoning should be stated clearly in the thesis statement. The conclusion should successfully tie up the thesis and address its significance.
The introduction piques the reader’s curiosity. The thesis is a statement of the author’s position. The issue is effectively summarized in the conclusion.
Background information is a jumbled, hazy collection of facts. The thesis is hazy and ambiguous. The conclusion is ineffective, as it fails to summarize the important arguments.
KEY POINTS
(Paragraphs in the body)
30% of the total
Main points/topic sentences that are well-developed and directly related to the thesis. The examples used to back up your claims are specific and precise. The analysis is written from a strong point of view, with scholarly research to back it up.
Three or more main points are related to the thesis, however some of them may be lacking in detail. The analysis depicts events from the author’s perspective, although more descriptive language could be used.
There are less than three key ideas/points explained, and/or they are poorly developed. The tale tells rather than shows.
ORGANIZATION
(Transitions and Structure)
a 20% discount
The thesis is strengthened by a logical progression of ideas with a defined structure. Transitions are useful and varied throughout the paragraph, not just in the topic sentences.
The flow of thoughts is logical. Although there are transitions throughout the essay, they are not varied.
Writing is not well-structured. Transitions between ideas are ambiguous or absent.
STYLE
(Variety, Sentence Flow, Diction)
10% of the total
The writing is fluid, deft, and well-organized. Sentences have a variety of structure and are forceful and expressive. The diction is constant, and the words have been carefully picked.
The writing is clear, with a variety of sentence structures and consistent diction.
Writing is perplexing and difficult to comprehend. There are fragments and/or run-on phrases in this piece.
APA
10% of the total
Correct punctuation, citation, tables, figures, and reference format are all examples of APA 6th edition model documents.
There should be no more than 5 occurrences of stylistic problems.
There are between six and ten instances of style mistakes.
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!