Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice
Instructions:
All grading is based on how strongly you support your analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reflection with reasoned conclusions based on the class material and discussion. All posts should be rich in content. I think, I feel, I believe, or my opinion are not to be used. Opinions may be asked for in a question but your reply must suggest the answer is concluded from the support of the material on the class. I agree and Great post without explaining why it is a great post based on the material, is not adding value to the class discussion.
APA citations must be used in all posts not just the initial post.
Your comments must relate back to the readings. Comment on at least two of your classmates’ postings per learning activity. (e.g. if you have two learning activities in one week the minimal number of posts should total 6). Your initial posting is due by midnight Wednesday. Your comment on your classmates’ postings is due by midnight Friday. Follow up is due Sunday at 11:59 PM. When a classmate makes a comment on your posting, you should reply to that comment. Plan on using Sunday to provide final replies to each other.
I added the below,
These are two discussions topics, here are what the discussions were about: under each discussion are other student’s discussion posts to the topic. I need one response per post. There will be a total of 4 responses for you to complete. Discussion Board responses must be answered thoroughly. Must be APA format, answer thoroughly, must have at least 1-2 verifiable legitimate sources per response. 200+ words needed answering thoroughly.
This is due by October 25, 2019 Friday at 11:00 pm EST. Plagiarism free.
Learning Activity #2
The best KM processes make the most money because they share information to all members of the organization allowing managers to make better decisions. Explain why this statement is true. Be sure to include in your answer what a KM process is and how it makes money by sharing information to all the organization. Give examples.
#1
Stratton,
Learning Activity #2
The above statement is true because using a KM system you are able to share the information across the company. So if you solve a problem then others through out the company can see how this problem was solved and possibly save time trying to fix it again. This in turn allows the company to profit from more work getting done. Another way the company profits “Another organization can buy or license the document to solve similar problems, creating a revenue source for the first organization” (Norton, 2014 para. 8). This is another way the organization can profit from using a KM system and is also another reason why the above statement is true.
Norton, D. (2014, May 26). Knowledge management process can increase productivity and profits. Retrieved from https://www.techrepublic.com/article/knowledge-management-process-can-increase-productivity-and-profits/
#2
Finneyfrock,
The knowledge management process is how organizations develop, maintain, and deploy strategically-sound knowledge while increasing the organization’s value (Dalkir, 2011). It can facilitate better and more informed decisions made by managers. It drives strategic thinking to solve problems more quickly and efficiently to save money on manpower and hours. Moreover, the sharing of information teaches and informs employees about best-practices and lessons learned to improve their work habits, while constructing a learning environment within the organization. Furthermore, this cycle increases the likelihood of innovation within the organization through the spreading of ideas, which can also help the organization stay ahead of its competitors.
Reference:
Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Learning Activity #3
Why is the KM cycle a cycle? Consider the nature of information and the dynamic nature of knowledge in your answer.
#1
Stratton.
The key to understanding why a KM cycle is a cycle its important to know what it is. A KM cycle is the process of taking company information and transferring it to corporate knowledge. There are four approaches that are associated with the KM cycle. ” These four KM cycle approaches are from Meyer and Zack (1996) , Bukowitz and Williams (2000) , McElroy (1999, 2003), and Wiig (1993)” (Dalkir & Liebowitz, 2011, p. 32). These four approaches are four different ways that information will be transferred through and created into corporate knowledge.
References
Dalkir, K., & Liebowitz, J. (2011). The Knowledge Managment Cycle. In Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed., p. 32).
#2
Finneyfrock,
The Knowledge Management cycle (KM cycle) is a cycle because explicit knowledge requires constant updating for the growth and maintenance of knowledge, which requires organizations to return to the beginning of the KM cycle, the “get” and “use” stages. The get and use stages consist of gathering massive amounts of information and being able to sift through it to identify valuable knowledge. Moreover, organizations should also gather tacit knowledge from content experts. Unlike codified and explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge is the type of knowledge that is not easily interpreted through words or illustrations by individuals without pertinent expertise in a particular subject (Dalkir, 2011). An example of tacit knowledge is trying to teach someone a new language; it would take lots of practice and experience speaking the language to become proficient in it.
Another KM cycle process is organizational learning where lessons and best-practices are learned. This is an essential step after gathering information, which transitions to applying new strategic ideas. The next key role of the cycle is the contribute stage, which involves making individual knowledge transparent and available across the entire organization. Where individuals share knowledge and experiences, which in-turn develops best-practices.
The assess stage defines mission-critical knowledge and maps current intellectual capital to future knowledge requirements (Dalkir, 2011). Capitals include quantitative measures of human competencies, good-standing customer relationships, and an organizational capital consisting of knowledge bases, processes, structure, culture, etc. Moreover, metrics are essential to analyze knowledge base growth, as well as organization profits and performance (Dalkir, 2011).
Next up, the build and sustain step of the cycle addresses why the KM cycle is cyclic in nature. This step ensures the intellectual capital maintains an organization’s viability. This step creates new knowledge or reinforces existing knowledge (Dalkir, 2011). Nonetheless, not all knowledge assets need to be held onto, which leads to the final step of the KM cycle, the divest step. This is the step where assets that are no longer valuable are removed or transferred outside of an organization. Sometimes knowledge is more valuable when it is transferred outside the organization where resources are better spent elsewhere (Dalkir, 2011). For example, money can be saved within the budget of an organization when ending no longer-needed contracts or training programs.
Reference:
Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!