IT 252 Java development Course Reflection and Responses
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
IT 252 Java development Course Reflection and Responses
Content Type
Review and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 3 paragraphs on the following:
What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?
How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
immediate java
This is the final week of the session! I hope you have been found our work with Java rewarding.
In this week’s discussion we have two primary areas of emphasis:
Describe basic data structures such as linked-lists, maps, sets, stacks, and queues.
Describe events and event handling for Java Swing applications.
These data structures are essential for Java development with many practical applications. Java programs form large to small make use f these data structures. Because the majority of Java applications are implemented in user environments with GUI interfaces, much Java programming is event-driven in nature. Can you think of commonly used Java classes essential for event handling?
I found everything about this course compelling. I had taken a previous Java course but did not have the opportunity to learn about linked lists and arrays. I thoroughly enjoyed building and adding to my project each week. The knowledge I have gained from this course can be applied in the real world. Each week, I was able to learn something more compelling than the week before. Throughout this course, I was able to demonstrate Intermediate-level java programming, which was very rewarding for myself. I plan to use this knowledge and apply it to real world scenarios in my future endeavors.
The discussion boards proved to be extremely helpful throughout this course as it also allowed me to gain knowledge from my peers. The discussion boards allowed room for improvement through the feedback that was provided from my instructor and peers. The discussion boards are actually a really great approach for us to interact and help each other. In the areas where I was weak, some of my classmates were stronger. I truly appreciate the meaningful feedback I received from my peers. It was also great being able to see the creative ideas that my classmates came up with.
The only other thing that I can think of that could have yield additional Valuable information is maybe a group project. I have had previous classes were we had group projects and i thoroughly enjoyed completing those projects with my classmates as we were able to learn from each other, share thoughts and ideas, and also have fun while doing so. Altogether, Instructor Noffsinger was great and I am truly appreciative of the time he put into making sure we understood everything and his patience. Best of luck to everyone in this final week and I hope to work with some of you again in future courses.
2nd peer to respond to
Hello class,
Another great session coming to an end. I would like to answer questions asked in this week assignment.
What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?
The most compelling topic in this course for me is GUI part of the application. I did all my GUI code and did not use scene builder generated code. It helped me understand how to build various components of the GUI and their placements in the window. I went this route mainly because I wanted to learn how code works when creating GUI. It was very fun process to start with blank page and end up with cool running program.
How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
Discussion board posts from my classmates helped me gratefully. I have read every post to see how the classmates solved the problems provided in the assignment. I would compare to my point of view and use combined method of both to develop my application every week. The best part of the session is the week 4 discussion board. I really enjoy reviewing my peer’s projects. I saw different idea of solving problems and it gave me ideas how can I improve mine.
What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
I wish I had more time to attend live chat and not watch recording. Live chats scheduled usually during my work hours so I could not ask questions I had live. Another approach I could find useful is the code examples in the live chat. I struggled in week 3 IP because I tried to create “evaluate” button method and was doing it wrong. I spent two days trying to figure it out, but then it clicked, and I was able to submit my work on time. That is the most rewarding part about Java class when you finally get it right.
Thank you everyone in this class for participation in discussion boards conversations. Thank you, professor, for answering my questions in the timely manner. I wish everyone good luck with future education. Stay on the right track and be safe out there.
Petr Fedotov.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!