Iron and Steel Industry Financial Strength Information
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Iron and Steel Industry Financial Strength Information
RUNNING HEAD: TEAM 1 TASK 2 1
TEAM 1 TASK 2
2
Executive Summary:
Team one was asked to examine ACME Iron’s current capital structure and determine the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). Comparing data from similar companies within the industry, we calculated a WACC of 5.75%.
Analysis:
During the analysis of ACME Iron’s current capital structure, we found that the company’s debt-to-equity ratio is 0.8235. The ratio computation was dividing the 2015s debt of 140,350,000 by the equity of 170,423,000. The industry’s average debt-to-equity ratio is 0.05-0.29. Therefore, ACME Iron’s debt-to-equity ratio falls in that range. The company’s debt accounts for 45% of financing and equity accounts for 55%. The weighted average cost of capital for ACME Iron is 5.75%.
Conclusion:
It is advisable to lessen debt and increase equity as our Debt-to-Equity ratio is unusually high compared to our competitors. This shows inherent risk in our company, which will deter investors, raise our fixed return rates due to high beta, and raise our overall cost of capital. Also, currently our WACC is 5.75% and should be used in any capital budgeting decisions as our discount rate. This will change if the above suggestion is acted upon.
Capital Structure and Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Calculations
After-tax cost of debt:
Rd(1-t)
8% (1-40%)= 4.8%
Cost of equity:
Cost of equity= 6.55%
Proportions of debt and equity in the firm:
Equity = 170,423,000
Debt = 130,000,000 + 10,350,000 = 140,350,000
Debt-to-Equity Ratio = 140,350,000/170,423,000 = 0.8235
Debt/(Debt + Equity) = 140,350,000/310,773,000 = 0.4516
Equity/(Debt + Equity) = 170,423,000/310,773,000 = 0.5484
How do we compute the WACC in this circumstance? Why do we need to be concerned with the WACC?
WACC is computed as:
0.4516 * 0.048 + 0.5484 * 0.0655 = 0.0576
WACC = 5.75%
Calculating the WACC requires knowing the values of the proportion of debt, proportion of equity, cost of debt, cost of equity, and tax rate. We should be concerned with the WACC because it is an essential indicator of the company’s overall cost of capital deployed in managing the business. It provides data to the company so that it can use it as a way to measure how to fund new projects. Decisions of investing in new projects use models like NPV and IRR derived from the company’s current cost of capital and the return a project will generate over its lifespan. WACC helps investors determine if an investment should be increased, decreased, or discontinued.
Any insights into the capital structure of ACME Iron?
With financing of 45% debt and 55% equity, it seems like this is a proper balancing of the two financing options. If this is a purposeful decision, this means ACME Iron is not worried about covering their debt costs. However, this will look like a large amount of risk to outside investors. The industry average Debt-to-Equity ratio is between 0.05 and 0.29 (CSIMarket, 2019). With a debt to equity ratio of 0.8235, they have significantly more debt than their competitors. This means that they use more debt to cover their projects, so if the company experiences losses or liquidation , the stockholders will get significantly less due to the preferential payment to lenders. Overall, it may be advisable to add more equity and lessen debt to attract investors and present the company as more stable
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!