Investigate Evidence-Based Solutions for Addressing Educational Issues
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Investigate Evidence-Based Solutions for Addressing Educational Issues
For the final assignment of your program, use your webcam and Kaltura to prepare a reflection video that responds to all the following prompts:
Part I
Think back to the early courses of your MEd or MEd-EDL program. Which major problem in education interested you at that time? What were the proposed solutions scholars suggested then? What solutions did you suggest then? Did you work on that same problem in the Capstone course? Why or why not? It is fine if you did not.
Part II
Now consider your knowledge, skills, and attitudes as a researcher and writer. What changes have you seen in your research and writing abilities since the start of the program?
Part III
Imagine that you are being asked to advise a new MEd or MEd-EdL student about the skills an NCU graduate ought to possess. Give the new student one example of how you would apply what you learned in this program to your chosen problem from Week 3 for only the program learning outcome that corresponds to your program.
MEd: Investigate evidence-based solutions for addressing educational, organizational, and community issues.
MEd-EdL: Facilitate effective educational leadership vision and integrity through strategic planning involving data-driven decision-making and evidence-based practice.
I’m thinking of a relationship with a close friend using social penetration theory.
‐————— ————– ———-‐————
For this 4-5 page paper, think about a relationship that has evolved in some way (can be one you have experienced yourself or have observed). Perhaps there was a predictable progression, a clunky transition, a growth spurt, relational push-pull, a change in status, a shift in relational satisfaction, etc. What concept could be used to explain what occured?
Choose ONE of the following constructs to apply to the relationship.
- Uncertainty ● Expectancy violations ● Relationship stages ● Relational dialectics ● Social penetration
The paper should proceed as follows:
Brief intro with Thesis
Each paper must advance a clear and specific thesis. In a brief introduction, set the stage for what you’re going to cover and present your thesis at the end of this intro. Please underline your thesis. In preparing your thesis statement, select one particular theory or concept and then word your thesis to show how the concept directly applies to your relationship or encounter. You can’t cover an entire chapter’s worth of concepts so the focus must be narrowed down. Here are examples, but of course you should develop your own:
In this relationship, differing preferences for autonomy and connection sparked a re-evaluation of expectations. In this relationship, unresolved conflicts in the differentiating stage led us to circumscribing. In this relationship, high frequency of communication combined with a lack of depth resulted in a casual dynamic.
Background What is the concept you’re working with?
Identify and define the concept or theory you have selected. Include important definitions and the concept’s connection to relevant aspects of interpersonal communication. Be clear, accurate, and thorough here. You can rely on your textbook for this information – outside research is not required. (Be sure to properly cite material or ideas from any outside source, including the textbook).
Application
How does the concept apply to your relationship or encounter?
In this section, present the communication behavior and outcomes that advance your thesis. Refer to things interactants did/said, direct quotes, observable situations/scenarios, nonverbal behavior, reactions, etc. Use these concrete observations as the “data” to support your claims in this section. Avoid indirect or vague impressions. For example, it is better to write “Liz showed her hesitance to get personal by talking about the weather” rather than “Liz seemed impersonal.”
Evaluation
What’s your assessment or takeaway?
This section involves a candid examination and interpretation of the relationship or encounter. Discuss the ways in which knowledge of the concept or principle might improve the communication of the relational interactants. What could have been done differently? Get insightful here!
———
Length:
- 4 FULL pages minimum – this means you must hit the bottom of the fourth page. Anything under the full four is eligible for no higher than a C. Even 3.5 pages gets no higher than a C.
- Large font, margins, or spacing = short length (have I made my point about length yet?) ● Please avoid “fluff” or “filler” types of things (i.e., a drawn-out introduction, extra return
spacing, repeating yourself in different words, etc.). Format:
- Standard font and margins, double spaced. ● Feel free to use MLA or APA, but I don’t grade on that. ● Cite any outside sources you consult, paraphrase, or quote.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!