Introduction to resistance to change
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Introduction to resistance to change
Write 300 words on discussion and respond to two articles with 200 words each
1)Write 300 words for discussion with 3 peer reviewed references
How would you suggest a leader overcome resistance to a change that is going to cause some people to lose their jobs?
2) Respond to two articles with 200 words each
Article 1
Introduction to resistance to change
The concept of resistance to change enlightens the professionals’ or leaders’ unwillingness to adapt the new infrastructure or technologies within the organization’s core by which the development of innovative environments can be restricted. While employees realize that they do not want to change their environment, resistance has ultimately occurred in the organization. Many professionals have also resisted changes because sometimes they have not acquired the prominent visualization about the consequences and purposes of those changes in the organization.
Suggesting ways to overcome the resistance to change
While leaders resist any changes to the organizational environment, various approaches need to be considered to overcome their resistance to changes. Firstly, leaders must communicate and educate their team members by which they can open their minds with the broad dimensions. While the leaders would be able to communicate with their team members and superior professionals, they become incurred various perspectives related to changes, which satisfy themselves to adapt the changes accordingly (Khan et al., 2017). Secondly, leaders must also participate in every event with their team members by which they become aligned with the acceptance, and the collaborative effort would engage people more in the change procedure by eradicating the issues. However, resistance to any changes leads to the employee’s termination from the job, so with participaton in the team activities, they deviate from such effective ideas, influencing them to accept the changes in the organization.
Thirdly, the leader should implement any changes to the organization in several stages instead of focusing on the single-phase implementation by which the team members and superior professionals would be able to incur sufficient knowledge pieces about the purpose of changes (Vos & Rupert, 2018). Deployment with the multiple phases results in reviewing the individual phase from where the professionals would be willing to accept the changes in the organizational environment. Lastly, leaders must also visualize the entire information regarding the changes to the organization to employees by which all of the professionals would be streamlined with the consequences regarding the changes. By visualizing the data to professionals, leaders would accurately showcase their transparency and visualize the improvement areas within the organization, motivating them to overcome resistance to change and accept the changed environment for incurring future benefits.
References
Khan, S. T., Raza, S. S., & George, S. (2017). Resistance to Change in Organizations: A Case of General Motors and Nokia. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 7(1), 16-25. http://indusedu.org/pdfs/IJRMEC/IJRMEC_1042_16125.pdf
Vos, J. F., & Rupert, J. (2018). Change agent’s contribution to recipients’ resistance to change: A two-sided story. European management journal, 36(4), 453-462. http://www.workwithjoy.nl/docs/Vos_Rupert%20EMR%20in%20press.pdf
Article 2
The agreement, can be an option to opt-out and overcome resistance. Protection from change is additionally engaged when individuals feel they will be alternately impacted by its results. This might be an eventual outcome of an agreement that their advantage or occupation potential will be hurt or that the compensations of the change are not worth the work required. To battle this sort of protection from change, a connection might contemplate offering motivations. Such moving powers might meld additional compensation, further made advantages, or offer facilitated work plans. This procedure expects that the game plan ought to agree. The inconvenience is that such blueprints can be excessive and don’t ensure liability with change.
Also, another way to deal with it can be support, authoritative change is customarily joined by a change to plans, disposing of individuals from (since a shockingly prolonged stretch of time back settled) safe spots. This may besides incite weariness, particularly if the alliance is committed to visiting change or business progress. Whether or not individuals transmit an impression of being suffering from progress, it is possible that they are basically surrendered to it. They should be given the help expected to connect new abilities to be made and guarantee that change burnout doesn’t change into a reality. Support expects that directors ought to urge their ability to grasp anyone on a more significant level and collaborate with their family. Offering pleasing help is likewise horrid, requiring organized bosses and pioneers to utilize getting-ready frameworks to be best when coordinating change in an alliance.
Reference:
Drago-Severson, E., & Blum-DeStefano, J. (2014). Change No to Yes: Leaders Find Creative Ways to Overcome Obstacles to Adult Learning. Journal of Staff Development, 35(4), 26–29.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!