Interview with an Educator 6
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Interview with an Educator 6
Running head: INTERVIEW WITH AN EDUCATOR 1
INTERVIEW WITH AN EDUCATOR 6
Interview with an Educator
Exemplary Student
EDU 304
Instructor X
December 14, 2017
Include a properly formatted title page.
Interview with an Educator
Include a brief introduction.
It seems practical and relevant that our EDU 304 course concludes with an interview of a respected educator. The teacher that I chose is a friend and co-worker of mine at Shenandoah Caverns. His name is Anthony Hammer. He works at the caverns during the summer with me. His full-time job, though, is serving as the Spanish teacher at Stonewall Jackson High School in Quicksburg, Virginia. His students range from freshmen to seniors. He teaches three classes per semester that meet daily. He has one section of Spanish 1 with sixteen students and two sections of Spanish 2, which have twenty-four students and nineteen students, respectively. The information I learned from this candid, detailed interview was instrumental in helping me to determine whether I have the “goodness of fit” for a career in education.
Summary and Analysis: Motivation and Philosophy
I was extremely excited to interview Mr. Hammer for this assignment. He is an entertaining person to work with at the caverns and I knew he must be an amazing teacher. When I asked him why he decided to become a teacher, he said it was because he wanted to make a difference in peoples’ lives. He knew that the teaching profession lended itself to that. He wanted to see his students grow into better individuals and well-informed citizens because of his direction. Mr. Hammer’s philosophy on education is simple: student-centered learning is key. Since he teaches Spanish, there is no state test that is mandatory for students to take. This allows him to have more creativity with his students. He lets his students explore their creative freedom and lets them know that it is ok to be different from their peers. He makes sure they realize that it is ok to make mistakes when learning a new language. His philosophy is that the students are the focus of the classroom and that they are the leaders and innovators of their learning. He is comfortable in his role as the facilitator.
Summarize the educator’s answers. Do not quote them.
After interviewing Mr. Hammer, I think that his teaching style ties into learning theory that we learned in our textbook. A learning theory “provides a framework to test hypotheses about human behavior” and “makes predictions about human acquisition of knowledge” (Krogh, Fielstein, Phelps, & Newman, 2015, Ch. 2). His theory is that education should have a high-level of student input and that this will yield the best results. Mr. Hammer demonstrates many of the attributes necessary to be a successful teacher. He is knowledgeable and fluent in the Spanish language. He is a charismatic and fun-loving teacher. He is extremely interested in the well-being of his students. All these things and more make him a successful educator. Mr. Hammer does not think his philosophy of education has changed over the years. He is still trying to keep his classroom as student-centered as possible. He always wants to remain the facilitator of learning and have his students remain the innovators of education. Through this interview, I wanted to determine how contrasting teachers may be from one another, and Mr. Hammer and I are certainly different. Our philosophies of education are unique from one another.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!