Internet Culture Project Proposal Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Internet Culture Project Proposal Discussion
Final Project Assignment Sheet
Your final project has two stages. For the first, you will submit a short proposal for the project you would
like to complete (due in week 9). Then, after receiving feedback on your proposal, you will submit your full
final project (due finals week). You will also receive a grading rubric for your final project in week 10.
Overall project description:
For your final project, you will be completing a mini ethnography of online culture. Very simply put, an
ethnography is a study of culture based on observations; ethnography often involves immersing yourself
in the culture you are studying. To do your ethnography, you will choose one small, specific corner of
online culture to observe for roughly one week. During your observations, you should take notes,
record information, and watch out for patterns, paying attention to things like: how users express
themselves or interact, what kinds of content users share, and what tensions arise within online
communities. Think of yourself as an anthropologist studying internet culture and/or phenomena.
After completing your observations, you will write a 2,000- to 3,000-word “report” (that is, an essay)
describing what you saw in the corner of internet culture that you studied. Your report should explain what
subculture you observed, how you completed your observations, and what notable trends you saw there.
You should also offer an analysis of the trends you observed, describing what makes them meaningful
and how they relate to our course topics. In your analysis, you should discuss at least 2 readings from
our course. You can either use these readings to help explain the meaning behind your observations or
you can use them to demonstrate how your observations actually complicate what we have discussed.
**Tip**: To give yourself enough time to complete your observations, you should begin observing your
internet subculture by the end of week 9, as soon as possible after receiving your proposal feedback.
STAGE 1: Final Project Proposal (already finished)
Format/length: 200 to 300 words, written in paragraphs or outline
For the first stage of this assignment, you will write a short proposal that describes the final project you
would like to complete. This should be 200 to 300 words long, which is equivalent to one or two
paragraphs. You can use some of this length to include bulleted lists or an outline if it fits your proposal,
but you should open and close your proposal with a series of full sentences.
Your proposal should explain:
– Which online subculture or “place” (e.g. specific corner of social media, specific element of a
platform, specific app, etc.) you are hoping to analyze.
– How you plan to go about observing this corner of internet culture. For example, will you visit it
daily and watch users? Will you record comments? Will you interact with community members?
– What makes you think that this will be a particular interesting and/or revealing corner of internet
culture to observe? What do you predict you will find through your observations?
– What 2 – 3 course readings do you anticipate will be relevant to your analysis of your
observations? That is, which course readings seem most related to this topic?
The more specific you can be about the culture or phenomenon you are observing, the better!
STAGE 2. Final Project
Due: Tuesday, December 7 by 11:59 pm
How to submit: via Canvas as .doc or .docx (or PDF for projects with visual elements)
Format/length: essay, 2,000 – 3,000 words
Please submit the full report as described in the “overall project description” above. Here are some
additional guidelines for your report:
– Your report should be written in full paragraphs using complete sentences.
– You will not primarily be graded for your language skills, but grammatical correctness is still
important. I need to be able to understand your ideas to give you credit.
– You are welcome to include screenshots or other images that help illustrate your descriptions. If
you use screenshots, please submit your project as a PDF.
– You can use any citation style for your references to our course readings (Chicago, MLA, etc.) as
long as you are consistent.
Final Project Assignment Sheet
This rubric describes the expectations for a successful final project. Please refer to the final project
assignment sheet for detailed instructions on what your project entails and how to complete it.
General expectations:
– Project fits with the overall prompt. It focuses on one specific area of online culture.
– Project is the correct length (2,000 – 3,000 words).
– Project is structured in a way that is clear. Ideas are grouped in paragraphs and are arranged in a
logical order.
– Writing is clear and has been proofread. Student has not overly relied on translation tools.
– All written elements are original and written by the student. Writing by others is properly cited. *
Expectations related to observations:
– Project reflects a sufficient amount of time and effort conducting first-hand observations.
– Project is appropriate in scope, avoiding topics that involve observing multiple areas or groups.
– Project describes how the student conducted observations and why they chose this method.
– Project highlights notable trends or interesting phenomena within the observed culture.
– Project uses specific, detailed examples as evidence to illustrate points about observed culture.
Expectations related to analysis:
– Project includes an analysis of the student’s observations.
– Analysis discusses the observed trends, discussing what makes them meaningful.
– Analysis ties the project to the topics of our course.
– Analysis discusses at least two of our assigned course readings, explaining how they either
illustrate the student’s findings or how the student’s findings challenge the readings.
Grading:
A grade = An “A” essay will meet all or nearly all of these criteria.
B grade = A “B” essay will meet most of these criteria; a few important criteria may not be met.
C grade = A “C” essay will meet many of these criteria, but a number of important criteria will not be met.
D grade = A “D” essay will meet at least half of these criteria, but will be notably weak in remaining areas.
F grade = An “F” essay will meet less than half of these criteria, or address most criteria insufficiently.
Internet Culture Project Proposal Discussion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!