Internal and External Stakeholder 1
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Internal and External Stakeholder 1
Running Head: INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER 1
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS 5
Internal and External Stakeholders
Student’s Name
University Affiliation
Internal and External Stakeholders
1. Identify the Internal and External Stakeholders.
Internal stakeholders in this issue are individuals within the criminal justice system who directly contribute to this issue (Baugh, 2015). They include police officers, correctional officers, probation officers, parole officer, judges as well as inmates. The external stakeholders include the government and society in general. They are the individuals who do not make up the criminal justice system but in one way or another affect it (Baugh, 2015).
2. Discuss how internal or external stakeholders have influenced the situation in a positive or negative way?
The influence of the external stakeholders on this issue is mostly negative. The government, on one hand, has negatively influenced this issue by allowing it to go on for so long and even to grow in two main ways. The first way is through lack of proper policy formulation and implementation. The government is in charge of running the prisons and the overall criminal justice system. They have failed in terms of not having good enough policies in place that can first and foremost reduce the level of delinquency in our society and consequently the number of offenders and also policies to help solve the issue of overcrowding given the fact that this is an issue that has persisted on for such a long time.
Government efforts have obviously not been successful in bringing the number of offenders down and also reducing the level of overcrowding and this is a major reason why this problem has really persisted on (Dandurand & Griffiths, 2006). The government has also failed in terms of funding since they have not been able to adequately fund the prisons to meet the needs of the big population of inmates or build more prison facilities to accommodate the growing numbers.
The society, on the other hand, has influenced this issue negatively in the simple sense that offenders come from the society. The level of moral degradation in the society is the source of this negative influence alongside the lack of proper values, systems and role models among other social issues. This has seen more and more individuals get into crime and as a result, there are large numbers of offenders being arrested who end up overcrowding the prisons.
The influence of the internal stakeholders is both negative and positive. Some internal stakeholders such as parole officers and probation officers have contributed positively. This is because there are a lot of efforts from the parole and probation department to give alternative sentences for prisoners who have shown positive changes by allowing them to serve in parole in probation and consequently easing the population in the prisons (Dandurand & Griffiths, 2006). Courts, however, have had a negative influence because they sometimes give unreasonably long sentences.
Correction officers in the prisons have further had a negative influence in the sense that they have failed to effectively impart positive behaviour change among inmates whether it’s their fault or the fault of the system and therefore individuals persist being prisons for long. Most inmates in the same sense go to prison and start engaging in bad activities which keep them in prison longer by denying them a chance to parole or probation. Police officers finally influence this problem negatively by engaging in unfair arrest acts for example against the minority and hence filling up prisons with individuals who should not be there in the first place.
3. How will you consider stakeholders in your solution to the problem?
From the above discussion, this problem is obviously not the doing of only one party. Each of the stakeholders mentioned above influences this issue in one way or another. In making consideration of the stakeholders in the solution to the problem, it is important to first be aware of the role that each of these stakeholders plays in bringing forth this problem. This is important to help understand how each of these parties will contribute to the solution. This is because the solution cannot be holistic unless there is buy-in from each of these stakeholders. The solution to this problem requires a collective effort. Beyond even considering the role that each of these stakeholders, I will also consider their input. To be able to develop a comprehensive solution, it is important to listen to the different perspectives around the issue for one to fully understand the different factors that come to play in regards to this issue. It is therefore important to consider the input of the stakeholders in the solution to avoid bias in the solution that one develops.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!