Intellectual Powers of Man Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Intellectual Powers of Man Essay
Response #1 A.Carson
Step 1: The Problem
The case has many problems, first Jennifer’s inability to divide the work amongst the group, her lack of mentoring her team members, and the team’s accountability. Thomas Reid once said, “The chain is only as strong as its weakest link”. In this case, the team is not the weakest link it is Jennifer, because of her inability to manage her old peers. Kinicki (2021) mentions Jennifer’s workdays became longer, with 15 hour days and no personal time on the weekends. The problem with this is Jennifer is not pushing her old peers to complete their tasks on time and in the proper manner. Another problem is the team is okay with a relaxed work ethic since they never get in trouble for it.
It is the manager’s job to ensure their employees are up to date and properly trained. Jennifer did not define the requirements her team needed to meet on the new project. The team’s lack of knowledge on their project caused them to have a lack of accountability because they knew Jennifer would fix any issues. Boni & Sammut (2019) highlighted the qualities of being a leader, thus including the ability to have a distinct voice, the ability to engage others, and adaptive capacity. These are things that Jennifer lacked in the passage, causing her to have issues with her team.
Step 2: Potential Causes
Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte said: “if you want something done, do it yourself”. That quote does apply to many situations however the workplace is not one. Jennifer is highly regarded and the top-performing she knew she was the best, causing her to not allow any of her peers to show their potential. One can conclude that Jennifer is used to doing everything herself because her peers were so relaxed with their work ethic. Another cause for the problem is Jennifer did not have any leadership training, causing her to not adapt well to her new role. Her staff knew her work ethic and they knew she would work hard for perfection so they did not have to step up, causing there own downfall.
Step 3: Recommendations
Being a new manager is sometimes hard and I have learned that from my personal experiences. I was like Jennifer at a point in time, completing all tasks by myself and never dividing the workload. The first recommendation I would make for Jennifer is to trust her team with a task she knows the individuals are strong. Another recommendation is defining how she wants the project done, and chastising anyone who does not follow the rules. Psalm 119:105 your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path (Smith). This scripture can urge Jennifer to understand just like when God says things to his people they follow she must do the same. She must set forth the foundation for her employees. Finding her voice as a new leader is important because it will set the tone and allow the team to know she is the leader first and a peer second. Also, I’d advise Jennifer to seek a management training course so she can understand how to transition from her previous role to her current role.
References
Boni, A. & Sammut, S. (2019). The Good, the Bad, the Ugly: Leadership Lessons From Two Companies-Amgen and Theranos. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. Vol 24. “The Good, the Bad, the Ugly”: Leadership Lessons From two Companies – Amgen and Theranos – ProQuest
Kinicki, A. (2021). Organizational Behavior: A Practical, Problem-Solving Approach. McGraw Hill. 3rd Edition.
Napoleon Bonaparte Quotes. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved October 26, 2021. Napoleon Bonaparte – If you want a thing done well, do it… (brainyquote.com)
Reid, T. (1785). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.
Smith, S. (2021). Open Bible. OpenBibleInfo. What Does the Bible Say About Change? (openbible.info)
Read Less
Response #2 K. Mariam
Step 1: Define the Problem
Elon Reeve Musk is an entrepreneur and business magnate of our generation. He is the founder and CEO of Space X and manages multiple other companies. Whenever I think of Elon Musk, this quote
comes to mind from Apple’s now-iconic “Think Different” campaign. “Here is to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things
differently. They are not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them. But the only thing you cannot do is ignore them. Because they
change things. They push the human race forward. While some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who
do.” Elon Musk is truly one of our generation’s exceptional and inspirational leaders. According to Kinicki, “Leadership is a process whereby individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal”
(Kinicki, 2006). Based on our case study, Musk has a keen ability to express his ideas and get people excited about them and has garnered praise for his visionary leadership. He has also been criticized for his
“unachievable” and “unrealistic” goals. For this reason and because of some of Musk’s personality traits, his companies have lost money and their reputations. Looking at figure 13.6 in our textbook, it seems that
the problem in Elon Musk’s case would fall under personal factors. In situational factors, his personality and leadership style can also be blamed for some of the problems his companies are facing.
Step 2: Identify the Causes of the problem.
According to our case study, Elon Musk seems to be an overconfident/ stubborn leader. He rarely takes ‘No’ for an answer. Even though this is not necessarily a bad trait, kept unchecked, it can create a
disengaged and unhappy workforce. Such a trait was clearly demonstrated in the manufacturing and production of the Model 3. Model 3 was the car that is designed for the masses but faced production
problems. The main reason is Musk’s ambitious goal of using robots to assemble cars. He went against the advice of many of his engineers which caused many of them to leave the company.
The second cause might be mental health. During his appearance on Saturday Night Live, Elno Musk revealed that he has Asperger’s syndrome. Asperger’s disorder is a “pervasive developmental disorder that
shares similar features of social impairment disorder, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors with the autistic disorder” (Khouzam, El-Gabalawi, Pirwani (2004)). This syndrome is associated with having very
obsessive interests and having difficulty in social interactions. Elon himself has said that he experiences highs and lows. This can explain his many foolish arguments with different people including Thailand
cave rescuer, Amazon’s Jeff Bezo and many more. He also seems very sensitive to criticism.
Step 3: Make recommendations for solving the problem
In order to solve these problems, we have to start by facing the facts and going directly to the source. As a recommendation, Elon Musk must work on his emotional stability and his leadership skills. He must
start by taking responsibility for his actions. In order to be a great leader, he must lead by example. If Elon Musk wants Tesla to be successful, he must embrace transformational leadership. Transformational
leaders “transform their followers to peruse organizational goals over self-interest” ( Kinicki, 2006). In its authentic form, this kind of leadership enhances the motivation, morale, and performance of employees
in a variety of ways. Having mentors and coaches that can train and guide him in this effort would be most useful.
Biblical Integration
When we read about King David and King Saul, we learn what God considers to be a good leader. In 1 Samuel 15, we read about King Saul’s disobedience to God’s clear instruction. We also see King Saul’s
rebellion and arrogance costing him dearly. He was rejected by God and his kingdom was given to David. God said, “I have found David Son of Jesse, a man after my own heart; he will do everything I want him
to do” (Acts 13:22). As the scripture clearly states, God was pleased with David for one main reason which is David was a great follower of God. He was obedient and loved and trust the Lord with all his heart.
In order for us to be great leaders, we must first be great followers.
Reference
Khouzam, H. R., El-Gabalawi, F., Pirwani, N., & Priest, F. (2004). Asperger’s disorder: a review of its diagnosis and treatment. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45(3), 184-191. http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fscholarly-journals%2Faspergers-disorder-review-diagnosis-treatment%2Fdocview%2F71897935%2Fse-2
King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (Original work published 1769)
Kinicki, A. (2006). ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: A PRACTICAL PROBLEM SOLVING APPRACH. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 3rd ed.
Kinicki, A. (2006). ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: A PRACTICAL PROBLEM SOLVING APPRACH: LEADERSHIP MATTERS. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 3rd ed., p.543.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!