Integration of patient-generated data in precision medicine
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Integration of patient-generated data in precision medicine
Patient-generated data (PGD) refers to health data that is collected directly by patients through mobile apps, wearables, and other personal health devices. PGD has the potential to revolutionize precision medicine by providing clinicians with real-time data on patients’ health status and enabling personalized treatment plans. In this article, we will discuss the potential applications of PGD in precision medicine and the challenges associated with its integration into clinical practice.
One of the key advantages of PGD in precision medicine is the ability to collect data on patients’ health status in real-time. This can enable the early detection of changes in patients’ health status and the identification of personalized treatment plans. For example, wearable devices can track patients’ heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs, enabling the early detection of cardiovascular disease and the development of personalized prevention strategies. Similarly, mobile apps can track patients’ diet and exercise habits, enabling the development of personalized nutrition and fitness plans.
PGD can also improve patient engagement and empowerment by providing patients with greater control over their health data and treatment plans. By collecting and sharing their health data with clinicians, patients can actively participate in the development of personalized treatment plans and monitor the effectiveness of their treatments. Additionally, PGD can enable patients to track their own progress towards health goals and receive personalized feedback and support.
PGD can also facilitate clinical research and drug development by providing researchers with access to large, diverse datasets. By collecting data from a broad range of patients, including those with rare diseases and underrepresented populations, PGD can enable the identification of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Additionally, PGD can enable researchers to conduct clinical trials more efficiently and cost-effectively by using remote monitoring and virtual visits.
Despite the potential benefits of PGD in precision medicine, there are also challenges associated with its integration into clinical practice. One challenge is the need for standardized and interoperable data collection and analysis systems. This requires the development of common data elements and ontologies that can enable the integration of diverse data sources and facilitate data sharing between different stakeholders.
Another challenge is the need for data privacy and security. PGD contains sensitive health data that must be protected from unauthorized access and use. This requires the development of robust data governance frameworks that ensure the secure and ethical use of PGD, as well as the informed consent of patients.
Additionally, the validity and reliability of PGD can be a challenge. While wearables and mobile apps can provide real-time data on patients’ health status, the accuracy and consistency of this data can vary. This requires the development of validation and quality control processes that ensure the accuracy and reliability of PGD.
In conclusion, PGD has the potential to revolutionize precision medicine by providing clinicians with real-time data on patients’ health status and enabling personalized treatment plans. While there are challenges associated with its integration into clinical practice, including the need for standardized and interoperable data collection and analysis systems, data privacy and security, and the validity and reliability of PGD, the potential benefits of PGD in precision medicine are significant and warrant continued investment and innovation. Ultimately, the integration of PGD into precision medicine has the potential to transform the way that healthcare is delivered, improving patient outcomes and reducing the overall burden of disease.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Integration of patient-generated data in precision medicine
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!