INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
INT 660 Critical Stakeholder Analysis Assignment
Strictly remember that milestone 2 is a continuation of milestone 1 and your country of
Choice remains the same. Also, milestone 3 will be a continuation of milestone 2… and so
On…
INT 660 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Milestone Two will consist of an analysis of the stakeholders involved in the negotiation. Students must consider the stakeholders’
interests in the outcome of the negotiation and how their interests and priorities will impact the negotiation process. Students must also
consider how interests may differ depending on cultural considerations. Milestone Two will conclude with an explanation of measures
that will be taken to ensure all stakeholders will be satisfied with the outcome of the negotiation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
III. Stakeholder Analysis
For the following, remember that the scope of critical stakeholders and interests may differ depending on cultural considerations.
Organize stakeholders based on priority.
- a) Who are the critical stakeholders involved in this negotiation?
- b) What is the significance of the role of each stakeholder?
- c) What are the priorities of each stakeholder?
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a two page Microsoft Word document with double-spacing, 12-point
Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least two sources cited in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade
Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Stakeholder
Analysis: Critical Stakeholders
Identifies the critical
stakeholders,
including special
interest groups,
government officials,
and individuals
Does not include all
critical stakeholders in
analysis
Does not identify the
critical stakeholders
20
Stakeholder
Analysis: Roles
Analyzes the role of
each key player in the
negotiation
Does not sufficiently
describe the
stakeholders’ roles in
the negotiation
Does not include an
analysis of
stakeholders’ roles
20
Stakeholder
Analysis: Priorities
Identifies the priorities
of each key player in
the negotiation
Does not sufficiently
describe the
stakeholders’
priorities in the
negotiation
Does not include an
analysis of
stakeholders’
priorities
25
Stakeholder
Analysis: Measures
Provides an
explanation of
measures that will be
taken to ensure all
stakeholders are
satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
Does not sufficiently
explain the measures
that will be taken to
ensure all stakeholders
are satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
Does not provide an
explanation of
measures that will be
taken to ensure all
stakeholders are
satisfied with the
outcome of the
negotiation
25
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no
major errors related
to citations,
grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization
Submission has major
errors related to
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas
Submission has
critical errors related
to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent
understanding of
ideas
10
Earned Total 100%
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!