Instructions for Personal Web Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Instructions for Personal Web Project
This project consists of two related parts: (a) a written e-marketing plan about yourself, and (b) development of a web site to support your personal e-marketing plan developed in (a). The purpose of this project is to help you understand the basics of Web page development and at the same time help build your own Web site.
Part I: E-Marketing Plan for yourself: (60 points)—about 5-7 pages
Part I is the written part of the project as follows:
—A separate cover page: Your Full Name, MU-ID, Course number (1 points)
—A separate content page: Table of Contents with page numbers (2 points)
—A separate summary: A brief executive summary of your project (2 points)
The marketing plan:
- Introduction: (10 points)
Write a paragraph or two to introduce yourself: Where you were born, where do you live now, your high school experience, your experience at Marshall University, work experience, etc.
- Your Career Analysis: (20) points)
- Articulate your career mission or goal in a few sentences.
- Your educational background: major, minor, etc.
- Your work experience
- Your technical skills, soft skills, leadership abilities, and talents, etc.
- Community involvement (voluntary work, membership in civic or social organizations, etc.)
- Select three companies for whom you would like to work after graduation. Give a brief description of each company. (10 points)
- Personal interests and hobbies (5 points)
- Your project Part I must be typed, single-spacing, using MSWORD with Times New Roman, font of 12. Check for any grammatical/spelling errors, typos, etc. Also, be sure to organize Part I using appropriate headings, subheadings, etc.
(10 points)
Part I (written) is due June 28, 9pm (EST)
Part II: Web Page Based on Part I:
(60 points)
You are now to develop a Web site to support the e-marketing plan you developed in Part I. You must attempt to include in your Web site as many of the following as possible, but you need not restrict yourself to these items: remember, you are not to submit anything in writing, but must design and upload your web site so that I can review it.
— A homepage – the front door to your Web site.
— Customer feedback page using a hidden “mailto” command, providing an email address for anyone trying to get additional information from you.
— A site map and a link to the site map from the home page;
— Links to those companies you would like to work for in future.
— A menu bar to assist site navigation (must work and be available from all pages);
— Appropriate background color and pattern;
— At least two graphics used appropriately (your picture, etc.)
— At least three relevant external links to other Web sites that would be complementary to your career goal or mission, other than three companies.
— Links to your interests, hobbies, etc.
— A statement concerning copyrights and legal jurisdiction covering the Web site.
You must actually upload your Web site and demonstrate it to me electronically. To do so, you can use Marshall University’s Web Uploading link:
http://www.marshall.edu/ucs/cs/helpdesk/helpdesk-webpages.asp
Your Personal Web Site must be running and uploaded on or before July 8, 9 pm EST and no later.
If I am unable to access your web site, it means you have not submitted it. Be very careful to make sure the wen link you will provide to me to view your web site is VALID.
Criteria to Evaluate your Website
(Ref: www.ehow.com/info_8188382_criteria-used-evaluate-pages-websites.html)
- Content Quality (15 points):The following contents will be used to evaluate the quality of your website: text, charts, images, social media used. Effective contents are reliable, factually accurate, objective (unbiased), and valid.
- Functionality (10 points):This criterion refers to an array of tasks and activities your website will facilitate its users. In particular, the criterion of functionality deals with the technical aspects of the site; it will be assessed in terms of whether the required technical functions (email, going back to previous page, video links, etc.) are “robust enough to carry out their required tasks reliably and without error.”
- Relevance (10 points): Relevance of a website refers to whether it is related and used to the purpose for which it was designed. To put it differently, “a relevant website will contain contents that people are interested in viewing, and will satisfy that interest.”
- Presentation (10 points): “Presentation refers to the visual style of your website and generally the way in which your contents are presented to users, visitors, viewers.” Your website needs to be visually attractive to its viewers (background colors, font style and size, whistles and bells, etc.
- Accessibility (15 points):“Since the range of people browsing your website may be wide, you need to make sure all viewers or visitors are able to access your website. For example, people with visual impairment, audio or other learning disabilities or challenges can encounter problems when viewing certain websites. Hence accessibility should be taken into account in order to include people with these issues. Also, due to technological advancement, many people are now accessing the Internet on mobile devices with varied types of hardware; your website must cater to as many of these as possible.”
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!