Instructional Strategies for Diverse Learners
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Instructional Strategies for Diverse Learners
Instructional Overview
The instructional strategy for diverse learners discussed in the essay is for Grade six learners. The learning standard selected is the English Language Arts (ELA). The class is constituted of seventy-five students. Some learners in the class have grade-level language proficiency while others are two years above the grade level among other categories. In terms of racial composition, the class constitutes of African Americans, whites, Hispanics, and Latino students. The majority of the learners come from middle-income families. The rest come from poor and rich backgrounds. The family backgrounds of the students differ. Some come from single-parent families while other learners hail from double-parent families. The class constitutes eleven students with trauma, thirty-five struggling students, fourteen English language learners, and fifteen gifted students.
Learners at great six have distinct features. For most learners, the puberty stage sets at sixth grade. Also, the learners at the level undergo rapid intellectual development. They become aware of their personality and identifies with people having similar traits to theirs. The students are also struggling to gain social acceptance in the sixth grade. They often interact with friends in the process of developing friendships.
For the teaching of the English Language Arts, focus areas are grammar, writing, communication, reading, and research. In grade six, based on the Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL), the students are expected to be conversant in active listening, communication, and working in groups with their learners. According to Virginia Standards of Learning published in 2017, section 6.4 of the assessment blueprint states that:
The student will read and determine the meanings of unfamiliar words and phrases within authentic texts.
a) Identify word origins and derivations.
b) Use roots, affixes, synonyms, and antonyms to expand vocabulary.
c) Use context and sentence structure to determine meanings and differentiate among multiple meanings of words.
d) Identify and analyse the construction and impact of figurative language.
e) Use word-reference materials.Strategies for Teaching Gifted Learners
Gifted learners possess special features not present among other learners. One of the characteristics depicted by gifted students is alertness. The learners are exceptionally alert during the teaching and learning process. They manifest high concentration levels unlike their peers in the classroom. The second trait of gifted students is the ability to grasp concepts quickly. During the teaching and the learning process, the educator uses less effort to present the class concepts to the gifted students due to the ease of understanding the class concepts. Thirdly, gifted students have an excellent memory. They keep information shared by teachers for longer periods. They can easily remember the learned concepts during the class assessments. Lastly, gifted learners comprehend complex words and narratives for their ages.
One of the strategies for teaching gifted students is through differentiated learning. Differentiated learning is where the educator uses different approaches to teach the students based on their needs. For the case of gifted students, differentiated learning involves narrowing down to individual needs to address (Ismajli et al., 2018). Gifted students have varied needs that the instructors need to address differently. Another strategy for teaching gifted learners is letting them remain at the helm of their learning process. The instructor should let the students ask questions and do more reading while in the class. The gifted students also need to be allowed to research on their own (Ismajli et al., 2018). When teaching the English Language Arts, the gifted learners will derive meanings for complex vocabularies within different texts.
Struggling Students
Struggling students possess myriad characteristics. One of them is that the struggling students get frustrated easily. The students can hardly keep up with the pressure to succeed. When they fail, they are more likely not to bounce back. Moreover, the students have no self-motivation (Tomlinson, 2017). They feel no want to succeed due to low self-efficacies. The students take longer than normal to complete a given task from their instructors. The delayed completion of the classwork is due to the perception from the learners that the work is difficult. Late work completion also emanates from a lack of motivation to learn.
For the English Language Arts (ELA), two strategies will apply to help the struggling students interpret and analyse different words and sentence structures. One strategy when assisting the students to learn interpretation and analysis of words involves giving them more time to think (Tomlinson, 2017). As struggling students, the instructors need to accommodate them by allocating more time for response. The second strategy in teaching ELA standards to struggling students is to avoid giving out the answers to the students quickly. Instead, the instructor should let the students analyse and interpret works independently before giving answers.
English Language Learners
English language learners are students who are learning the native English language. Their English is developing in complexity but have problems understanding conversations quickly. Consequently, the students miss important class concepts during the teaching and learning process. In enabling the students to interpret, analyse and match words with similar meanings during the teaching process, the instructors need to develop unique strategies. One of the strategies for teaching ELL students is establishing a close relationship with students while providing a culturally responsive teaching approach (Dincer, 2020). A closer relationship with the students enables the instructors to provide the right assistance to the students during the analysis and interpretation of the concepts on the English core standard. Further, a culturally sensitive teaching approach encourages the students to learn more. Additionally, the educators can reduce the speaking pace and increase the waiting time. The strategy will afford the students more time to analyse and interpret the different words and give their synonyms as required in the assessment blueprint for grade six learners.
Students Impacted by Trauma
Traumatized students manifest different signs. One sign is constant anger because angering traumatized students during the teaching and learning process is easier. Secondly, the students are aggressive (Post et al., 2020). They respond violently to situations at school and have difficulties relating with their classmates due to their violent nature (Post et al., 2020). The students experience difficulties in concentrating during the learning process.
In meeting the objectives of the Standards of Learning, the educators can connect the emotionally disturbed students to counselors or social support programs. Counselling the students will balance their emotions and assist them to concentrate during the classes (Post et al., 2020). The second strategy towards assisting the students is focusing on their strengths in the learning process. The educator should aim at reinforcing the abilities of the students for improved classroom performance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there are numerous strategies an educator can use to address the varying needs of the learners in the classroom. The strategies include personalized learning, establishing a close academic relationship with the students, use of differentiated learning, exercising a culturally sensitive teaching approach, and connecting students with emotional needs to support programs. All the strategies can be applied in the learning process through the use of alternative assessments. The instructor should adopt alternative tests to capture the proficiency of the learners over a period rather than traditional tests to determine the depth of knowledge.
References
Dincer, A. (2020). Understanding the Characteristics of English Language Learners Out-of-Class Language Learning through Digital Practices. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 4765. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.03
Ismajli, H., & Imami-Morina, I. (2018). Differentiated Instruction: Understanding and Applying Interactive Strategies to Meet the Needs of all the Students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 207218. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11315a
Post, P. B., Grybush, A. L., Flowers, C., & Elmadani, A. (2020). Impact of childteacher relationship training on teacher attitudes and classroom behaviours. International Journal of Play Therapy, 29(3), 119130. https://doi.org/10.1037/pla0000118
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. ASCD.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!