INMGT 400/600 Organizational Leadership Assignment 1
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
INMGT 400/600 Organizational Leadership Assignment 1
Leadership Competencies Development – An IDP
The Scenario
You have just had a meeting with your boss (leader and mentor) who has strongly suggested that you are too focused on work and that you need to put some balance into your life, take some time for yourself, and expand your horizons. He/she has suggested you take up a new hobby as a way of accomplishing all of these goals. He/she has offered to meet with you again in two weeks to view your IDP (Individual Development Plan) and offer further advice.
Assignment Instructions and Requirements
- Rename this document, and delete everything except the IDP form at the end of the document
- Identify one (1) short-term (meaning within the next 12 months or sooner) personal development goal(the acquisition/mastery of a new skill and/or knowledge) you would like to achieve.
IMPORTANT NOTE: NOT a professional or career goal, and not a personal wellness, affirmation, or life goal (Examples of unacceptable goals for this assignment: get my master’s degree, get a job, get married, lose 15 pounds, stop smoking, take a vacation, etc. etc. etc.)
- In the IDP form write your personal development goal using the SMART format (if you don’t recall or don’t know what the SMART format is then Google it), then list the barriers, if any, that maybe preventing you from being able to start to working on your goal today.
- Complete the IDP form by identifying the specific objectives/measureable milestones you will use to reach your goal, the specific action you will take to complete each objective, how you will measure your progress and know when you have been successful, and your time line (start date and deadline).
- That’s it – nothing else – submit your IDP before the stated due date and time. Late submissions will receive no credit (0 points).
An example -DO NOT COPY- of a personal goal (before putting into form):
Before this time next year, I want to learn how to play three songs on the violin; a slow song, a medium-paced song, and a fast song. I don’t currently own a violin and I have never played one before. First I will have to buy a used violin and find someone to give me lessons.
Objectives for achieving goal (after putting into form)
|
Objectives |
Actions Required |
Success Measure |
Deadline |
1 |
Obtain a violin |
Check music stores and Craig’s list, buy a used one for $300, or rent one |
Have obtained a violin |
3 weeks from today |
2 |
Learn how to tune it |
Watch YouTube |
Have a tuned violin |
1 week from getting violin |
3 |
Find someone to give me lessons |
Check music stores and local newspapers |
Scheduled weekly lessons with instructor |
4 weeks from today |
4 |
Start lessons |
|
|
6 weeks from today |
5 |
Practice every day |
Set aside 30 minutes each morning to practice |
Minimum of 4-hours practice each week |
6 months from start of lessons |
6 |
Learn first song |
Have instructor select a slow easy song, and learn it |
Play song from memory without any mistakes |
2 months from start of lessons |
7 |
Learn second song |
Have instructor select a medium song, and learn it |
Play song from memory without any mistakes |
4 months from start of lessons |
8 |
Learn third song |
Have instructor select a fast song, and learn it |
Play song from music without any mistakes |
6 months from start lessons |
The following criteria will be used for evaluation:
Criteria |
|
|
|
Personal Development Goal and Explanation |
(4 points)
Goal is a SMART personal development goal – and explanation of how it makes you a better leader makes sense
Met expectations |
(3 or 2 points)
Goal is a partially SMART personal development goal or a SMART non-personal development goal or explanation doesn’t make sense or is missing
Fell short of expectations |
(1 point)
Wrote something but Goal is not a personal development goal and not a SMART goal and explanation is missing or doesn’t make sense
Unsatisfactory |
Objectives and Plan |
(4 points)
As presented form is complete, path is clearly defined making goal attainable
.
Met expectations |
(3 or 2 points)
As presented form is mostly complete but missing objectives, pathway to goal lacks clarity
Fell short of expectations |
(1 point)
Form is incomplete and missing objectives, no pathway to goal
Unsatisfactory |
Professionalism |
(2 points)
Followed directions, no formatting errors, no writing errors |
(1 point)
Followed directions and less than 3 formatting and/or writing errors |
(0 points)
Did not follow directions or formatting requirements and/or more than 2 writing errors |
Timeliness |
|
|
(penalty -2points) Submitted after the time due but within 24 hrs. |
Delete everything above this line
Name:
Personal Development Goal: |
Explain how you believe achieving this goal will contribute to your effectiveness as a leader: |
Barriers to first overcome: |
|
Objectives |
Actions Required |
Success Measure |
Deadline |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
(add rows as needed)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
INMGT 400/600 Organizational Leadership Assignment 1
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!