Information Management Service Management System Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Information Management Service Management System Discussion
Business requires people. People are fallible. They can make mistakes and at times use poor judgment. Poor judgment can take the form of poor ethical behavior. Practically every day, the news seems to show the ramifications of unethical behavior. Financial crises are often preceded by poor ethical behavior on the part of managers, accountants, or lawyers. The disregard of safety standards has played a large role in coal mining and oil drilling disasters. What effect can good service management practices have on mitigating poor judgment and unethical behavior?
Describe a recent instance (within the last three years) of questionable ethics by an individual or corporation. Based on what you have learned in this course, what areas of service management might have precluded the unethical behavior of the individual or corporation or allowed the unethical behavior to have been detected and rectified. Explain. Give specific examples of how the services could have been delivered that would have prevented or otherwise mitigated the unethical behavior.
.Please response to this post(1)
Capital One Financial is a finance company based in America that is owed a lot of money by many of their clients. They claim that they are compliant with existing laws with no apparent regret over their dealings. Any criticism has come back against Capital One Financial as a result of they create profit off of order flow, not as a share of their customer’s profitableness. The realm of service management that may have precluded the unethical behavior is, at the minimum, in their service catalog and data management. The service catalog is that the curated and revealed assortment of business and knowledge technology services performed by the company, and knowledge management is the list of strategies about knowledge and information within the firm. Either method represents simply 2 of the areas of service management that might are answerable for forestalling or allowance of the unethical behavior.There are a number of things Capital One Finance could do to be more ethical. First, they may have an improvement program to gradually allow riskier investments over time than trading on the platform. Second, they could change their business model to only take advantage of winning customers. Third, they could hire financial investors to advise clients. Fourth, they could hire support staff to be more accessible when customers call to speak to a live person.Fifth, they could provide better responses to public relations showing more emotional discomfort for customers who have committed suicide on bad exchanges on the platform.
Please response to this post is the second post,
What happens when a company provides employee incentives without proper quality control and checks and balances? (Lupo, 2019) “The Wells Fargo credit card scam involved Wells Fargo employees who opened more than 565,000 phony credit card accounts. Employees also received company incentive bonuses for meeting or exceeding quotas based on the sham accounts” (para. 1). This was a well-published event for Wells Fargo and over 5,000 employees lost their jobs due to unethical business practices. Was this the fault of the employees who were opening dummy accounts? The Managers for not auditing the accounts that were open (and most likely receiving bonuses for their teams opening so many new accounts)? Or upper management not realizing the possible ramifications by approving this type of incentive, or possibly even ignoring the possible outcomes? The answers to the previous question are hard to answer but using proven service delivery practices could have helped to avoid this unfortunate event. Six Sigma Practices to Avoid Unethical Business Pracitces Six Sigma was (Eby, 2017) “Originally formulated in manufacturing, the methodology is now practiced in fields such as healthcare and finance, in Fortune 500 companies all over the world” (para. 1). The main goal of the Six Sigma tools is to find defects in current processes, services, or products using Six Sigma techniques that would have prevented an employee incentive program that encourages employees and managers to establish fake credit cards. A core principle of Six Sigma is to achieve stable and predictable business processes by analyzing historical or current data. If upper management was using these techniques, they may have decided not to improve this incentive program. Or when the data was analyzed when the incentive program was activated, data should have shown that there may be some unethical behavior being performed. Stopping to consider what is going right or wrong is another core concept of Six Sigma that could have avoided this event. If upper, middle, or lower management would have stopped to consider the possible consequences of the incentive program, Wells Fargo could have avoided millions of dollars in legal fees, a negative public perception, and loss of customer trust.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!