Individual Average Scores Descriptive Statistics Discussion Questions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
We studied and discussed how to analyze and interpret research once we’ve collected our data this week. This is beneficial for a variety of reasons: 1. We learn how to run statistical tests, 2. we learn how to develop and interpret statistical tests, and 3. we learn how to analyze and assess tests run by other researchers.
Instructions: First, we’ll practice running descriptive statistical tests, then we’ll practice writing analyzed tests and interpreting analyzed data:
You will conduct a test for: in the first phase, using the excel worksheet provided. The three factors are: 1. central tendency, 2. shape, and 3. dispersion.
In the second portion, I’ll provide you two hypothetical research findings from which you might produce descriptive statistics results. You’ll need to complete the following tasks:
Write two sentences that explain the statistical tests’ findings.
Interpret and explain what the result of the central tendency, the shape of the distribution, and dispersion mean.Section 1: Performing descriptive statistics on your own:
Download or upload the excel file to excellent sheets. For each participant, calculate an average score. Conduct three descriptive statistical tests based on these average results. One for determining central tendency, one for determining form, and one for determining dispersion.
Isabelle recently did a survey to determine the differences in mask-wearing habits in rural and urban places across the United States. Isabelle received a total of 100 survey responses (50 people from metropolitan areas and 50 people from rural areas). A 5-point Likert scale was used to ask the participants many questions. The higher the number, the more likely you are to wear a mask.
Stanford Health Care engaged James and his colleagues to investigate how comfortable patients are with sharing health concerns to their doctors. They suspected that the patients were of different ages. As a result, James and his colleagues conducted a poll using a 1-to-7 Likert scale. The greater the number, the more comfortable they are about sharing to their healthcare providers.Section 2: Writing and interpreting statistical data:
Metropolitan Mean: 4.3 Rural Mean: 2.9 Metropolitan Skew: 0.8 Rural Skew: 0.3 Metropolitan Standard Deviation: 0.7 Rural Standard Deviation: 1.6 Metropolitan Standard Deviation: 0.7 Rural Standard Deviation: 1.6
322 completed surveys were received by James and his colleagues. The younger group consisted of 103 people aged 18 to 36. The middle group consisted of 127 people aged 37 to 55. The senior group consisted of 92 volunteers who ranged in age from 56 to 88. The following descriptive results were obtained:OUTSIDE RESOURCES WERE NOT REQUIRED. Young Mean: 2.3 Middle Mean: 5.6 Elderly Mean: 6.3 Young Median: 2.1 Middle Median: 5.6 Elderly Median: 6.2 Young Standard Deviation: 0.4 Middle Standard Deviation: 2.1 Elderly Standard Deviation: 1.0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!