Important Tool for Determining the Critical Drivers of Waste and Variation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Important Tool for Determining the Critical Drivers of Waste and Variation
\Review the Case Study here, and then answer the following questions:
NOTE: Be sure to provide quality management-based support for your answers below by using specific informatics-base data obtained from the case study.
How did developing a process map of the current discharge process help the team get started? How was the staff involved?
What was the most important tool for determining the critical drivers of waste and variation?
Identify factors that contributed to process variation in the discharge process from the discharge order to the patient leaving.
What specific changes were made in the sub-process of the discharge order to the patient leaving as a result of workflow analysis?
What specific changes were made in the sub-process of the patient leaving the hospital room to the computer showing the bed as available as a result of the workflow analysis?
Part II:
For Part II, you will work in an assigned team. Team assignments have been posted in the Announcements section of the course.
Get together with your team and discuss and critique the information presented below. You will do this discussion/critique in the Assignment Part II Team Discussion Board. Post to the Discussion and interact with your teammates to address your thoughts about integrity and respect in working as part of a team. DO NOT WAIT until the end of the week to post to the Team Discussion Board, as you will need ongoing interaction with your teammates in order to successfully complete this part of the Assignment. You will turn in (copy/paste) the entire discussion as your work for Part II.
Grading will be done as a team based on content and participation. Students who do not participate or contribute satisfactorily to the team Assignment will be graded individually.
Scenario:
What you don’t learn from the Case Study is how the team worked together and what types of issues came up along the way. As with all teams, this team’s meetings and work did not proceed perfectly and without problems. Remember that a multidisciplinary project team worked to improve the process and included nursing staff, case managers, an information technology representative and the chief medical officer.
At the very first meeting, there was some tension between one of the nursing staff and one of the case managers. Let’s call them Ms. A and Mr. B. They had different opinions and seemed to be competing. The tension was noticed by the others.
At the second meeting, the two actually argued. Ms. A was quite rude and defensive, and said things to Mr. B that the others considered very disrespectful. The team leader addressed Ms. A and Mr. B after the meeting, individually, and asked if there was anything that he could do to help them iron out their differences. The leader reminded them to be professional.
The third meeting went well, and Ms. A and Mr. B seemed to just stay clear of one another. Work on the process improvements began, and each of the team members had tasks they were to work on. One month into the project, one of the team members heard Ms. A tell a coworker “I make all of the decisions for the team because nobody else knows what they are doing. I designed the whole plan. I heard Mr. B is going to get kicked off the team because he is such a jerk.”
Imagine that you are the team member who overheard this conversation. Address your thoughts about integrity and respect in working as part of a team. Support your thoughts from information from the textbook or another source. What would you do after you hear this conversation? Will you keep it to yourself or will you tell someone? Will you confront Ms. A directly? What can you do to help direct Ms. A and Mr. B toward more positive collaboration?
Case studies adapted from:
Oachs, P. & Watters, A. (2020). Health information management: Concepts, principles, and practice, instructor’s manual: Part V development of the patient health record (6th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Health Information Management Association.
Requirements:
Responses to each case study should be no more than 2-3 pages<
Use correct grammar and spelling and cite your references as appropriate
Submitting your work:
Submit your Assignment to the appropriate Dropbox. To view your graded work, come back to the Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Make sure that you save a copy of your submitted work.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!