Implementing A Negotiation Policy For Hospital Suppliers
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Implementing A Negotiation Policy For Hospital Suppliers
Scenario
Due to recent financial strains, the Board of Directors at Wynn Regional Medical Center wants to implement a negotiation policy for hospital suppliers. As the Vice President for Human Resources at WRMC, you have been tasked with creating the negotiation process that the Purchasing Department will use when dealing with medical suppliers.
Instructions
Create a PowerPoint presentation for the Board of Directors with the proposed negotiation policy. The proposal should address the following and provide support and examples for each:
Which negotiation model will you use for the policy?
What are the phases of negotiation?
Why did you choose this model?
What are common mistakes made in negotiation?
List three to four mistakes
How will you avoid these mistakes?
Explain how cultural diversity influence negotiations.
What are steps that HR professionals can take to avoid diversity and cultural related conflicts during negotiations?
The presentation should contain speaker notes for each slide or voiceover narration to discuss the above information.
Rubric:
Criterion 1
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryClear and thorough justification for the selected negotiation model. Includes multiple examples for each of the sub-bullet questions.0B – 3 – ProficiencyDetailed justification for the selected negotiation model. Includes at least one example for each of the sub-bullet questions.0C – 2 – CompetenceBasic justification for the selected negotiation model. Briefly addresses all sub-bullet questions.0F – 1 – No PassNo or insufficient justification for the selected negotiation model and/or does not address all sub-bullet questions.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0
Criterion 2
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryClear and thorough description of common negotiation mistakes. Provides multiple supporting examples for each sub-bullet prompt.0B – 3 – ProficiencyElaborative description of common negotiation mistakes. Provides at least one supporting example for each sub-bullet prompt.0C – 2 – CompetenceBasic description of common negotiation mistakes. Briefly addresses each sub-bullet prompt.0F – 1 – No PassNo or insufficient description of common negotiation mistakes and/or does not address all sub-bullet prompts.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0
Criterion 3
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryClear and thorough explanation of cultural diversity’s influence on negotiations. Provides multiple supporting rationales for each sub-bullet question.0B – 3 – ProficiencyElaborative explanation of cultural diversity’s influence on negotiations. Provides at least one supporting rationale for each sub-bullet question.0C – 2 – CompetenceBasic explanation of cultural diversity’s influence on negotiations. Briefly addresses each sub-bullet question.0F – 1 – No PassNo or insufficient explanation of cultural diversity’s influence on negotiations and/or does not address all sub-bullet questions.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0
Criterion 4
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryClear and thorough speaker notes for each slide or voiceover narration that enhance the presentation content with multiple supporting examples.0B – 3 – ProficiencyElaborative speaker notes for each slide or voiceover narration that enhances the presentation content with supporting examples.0C – 2 – CompetenceBrief speaker notes or voiceover narration.0F – 1 – No PassNo, insufficient, or vague speaker notes or voiceover narration.0I – 0 – Not Submitted0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!