IAU OFI Systems Analysis and Analyzing Quantitative Results Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
IAU OFI Systems Analysis and Analyzing Quantitative Results Essay
Description
2 pages
Baldrige case focus: systems analysis and analyzing quantitative results.
The Baldrige Quality Performance criteria are the “Gold Standard” for assessing quality performance in businesses. There is a lot to learn, but it is worth the effort. You might very well want to introduce the Baldrige standards to your own company. Companies that are committed to continuous improvement often have a full time manager responsible for doing a Baldrige analysis. This might turn into a career advancement.
Read the entire application to gain an overview of the company. Take notes. You’ll only work with categories 4, 6 and 7.
Make sure you utilize the Tips suggestions from that document in Activities.
Pay special attention to the Profile, You will only be responsible for analyzing three Categories: Category 4 Measurement, Analysis and Knowledge Management both (4.1 Measurement, Analysis and Improvement of Organizational Performance and 4.2 Management of Information, Information Technology and Knowledge) and Category 6 Process Management (6.1 Work Systems Design and 6.2 Work Process Management and Improvement). Lastly analyze the associated Category 7 Results for Category 4 and 6 only.
You will have the option of working in a group again. You may form new groups if you wish. Groups may vary in size from 3-5 people. If you plan to work in groups, please make the arrangements with your classmates and inform me.
You will evaluate the applicant’s performance using the Evaluation Processes provided in the Baldrige Excellence Framework There are 2 major tasks to this assignment.
1) In your analysis of each category 4 and 6 noted above, you will identify ONE STRENGTH of the organization in that whole category and ONE OPPORTUNITY FOR IMPROVEMENT (OFI) for that Category. Explain your rationale for identifying them as such. Evidence from the application is probably the best evidence in this case. NOTE: You do not have to do Strengths and OFIs for every sub-category. If you see additional striking examples you are welcome to add them.
2) You must evaluate the quantitative evidence provided in the Results Category (7). You must indicate whether or not they have provided Levels, Trends, Comparisons/Benchmarks and Integration.
You must provide comprehensive headings so I know what the focus is in that section. For example, Heading: Strengths in Category X or OFI for Category Y.
All analysis should be essay length answers, not short answers.
Place your Word document containing a minimum of one Strength and one Opportunity for Improvement comment. [You are welcome to make more if you wish.] These should follow the format of the Sample comments for 7.3.
Your comments will be evaluated on:
- Clarity of content – communication skills
- Accuracy of the description and analysis of the data
- Modeling of the format for useful comments demonstrated in the Sample doc.
- The comment is actionable and contains a compelling “so what” statement
IAU OFI Systems Analysis and Analyzing Quantitative Results Essay
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!