Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Humanity as ingroup Outcome: Perspective taking
Week 10 Celebration of Knowledge (20 pts)
Objective: the objective for this week’s Celebration of Knowledge is for you to apply your newly acquired statistical knowledge to answer the questions below.
Directions: to complete this assignment, read through each of the questions and provide your answer.
Due: March 17th (11:59 PM)
- [1 pt] You examine results and notice there is a significant, positive linear relationship between TIME SPENT STUDYING FOR EXAM 2 and EXAM 2 SCORES (r = .76, p = .05). Explain what this means (i.e., explain what can we conclude about the direction and strength of relationship between the two variables):
- [1 pt] What is the shared variance between the two variables in the previous question? In your answer provide: the r2 value, the effect size, and describe what this means.
(a) r2 value and effect size:
(b) What does this mean?:
- [2 pt] Jake was conducting a study examining the association between the amount of time spent online and knowledge of world affairs. He found a significant, positive association between the two variables, r = .38, p < .05. When Jake presents his results to you, he tells you that the findings from the study demonstrate that spending a lot of time online causes an increase in one’s knowledge about world affairs. You are concerned that Jake doesn’t understand correlation and causality, so you decide to write a brief note explaining how Jake should interpret his results. Provide your brief response below.
Use the output below to answer the following questions.
Correlation Output |
|
Number of social media accounts |
Quality of online communication
(1-10 scale) |
Number of social
media accounts |
Pearson Correlation |
1.000 |
-.857** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
. |
.000 |
|
N |
24 |
24 |
Quality of online communication
(1-10 scale) |
Pearson Correlation |
-.857** |
1.000 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
. |
|
N |
24 |
24 |
- [1 pt] Provide the r and p values. For the p-value simply indicate if p is above or below .05. r = , p
- [2 pt] Describe what the r value tells us about the relationship between the number of social media accounts one has and the quality of one’s online communication.
Use this output to answer the following questions.
Predictors: Humanity as ingroup Outcome: Perspective taking
Reminder: Remember how to interpret the p-value! When interpreting the p-value report if p is below (p < .05) or above (p < .05) .05.
- [1 pt] The model accounts for ________ of the variance (p _____) in perspective taking.
- [2 pts] Is humanity as ingroup a significant predictor of perspective taking? Provide the regression weight, interpret the p-value, and interpret the regression weight below. b =________ , p _________
Interpret the regression weight:
- [3 pts] If a participant’s humanity as ingroup score is 3, what will their perspective taking score be? Use the regression formula ( y = bx + a) and show your calculations below.
Use this output to answer the following questions.
Predictors: Humanity as ingroup, Empathy, Depression, Intercultural communication anxiety
Outcome: Perspective taking
Reminder: Remember how to interpret the p-value! When interpreting the p-value report if p is below (p < .05) or above (p < .05) .05.
- [1 pt] The model accounts for ________ of the variance (p _____) in perspective taking.
- [2 pts] Is depression a significant predictor of perspective taking? Provide the regression weight, interpret the p-value, and interpret the regression weight below. b =________ , p _________
Interpret the regression weight:
- [2 pts] Is intercultural communication anxiety a significant predictor of perspective taking? Provide the regression weight, interpret the p-value, and interpret the regression weight below. b =________ , p _________
Interpret the regression weight:
- [2 pts] Is empathy a significant predictor of perspective taking? Provide the regression weight, interpret the p-value, and interpret the regression weight below. b =________ , p _________
Interpret the regression weight:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!