Human Respiratory Tract Microbial Community Structures
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Human Respiratory Tract Microbial Community Structures
Hearing paper, Winter 2022 Counts as 2 DBs (10% of final grade)
Everyone agrees that hearing is an important sense. Helen Keller went so far as to say that her deafness cut her off from people. You probably don’t realize just how important is in your everyday life and how much you rely on it to get through your day.
For this assignment, you will write about what it would be like to experience a diminished sense of hearing. You will be asked to wear earplugs in different situations and note the consequences on your daily activities.
See directions for the proper way to put in ear plugs �
Include in your paper at least 2 observations that were the result of your impaired hearing. Describe the situation in which you observed the effect and how it affected your hearing. Some examples:
- speech perception & production 2. getting about by foot 3. locating & identifying sound sources 4. daily activities (e.g., cooking, typing, walking across
campus, etc) 5. Also, try wearing just one ear plug and noting any
differences.
DO NOT wear earplugs while driving, and DO NOT cross busy intersections by yourself!
You also need to include at least 2 peer-reviewed articles to back up your conclusions about your observations – what has research revealed about how we hear?
Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length (typed, 1-inch margins, double spaced) and contain APA style in text citations, reference page, and title page. See my writing/APA handouts on Canvas or the APA format from Purdue OWL website.
In addition, your paper will be graded on the basis of ingenuity and clarity in writing. It is permissible (and encouraged) to have other people (including those in the writing center) read a copy of your paper before you hand it in.
Have fun!
Grading Rubric
Name:______________________________________ Grade:______________/10__________________
_______ (.5 point) Introduction ____ Did you give a good introduction to the paper?
_______ (1 point) Method ____ Did you explain clearly how you went about this assignment?
_______ (3 points) Observations ____ (1.5 points) Did you describe and explain observation #1 clearly? ____ (1.5 points) Did you describe and explain observation #2 clearly?
_______ (4 points) Peer-reviewed research ____ (2 points) Did you clearly talk about the research findings from reference #1? ____ (2 points) Did you clearly talk about the research findings from reference #2?
_______ (.5 point) Wrap up ____ Did you have a good last paragraph that summed everything up?
_______ (1 point) APA Style ____ (.5 point) References – Did you properly cite your references within the text? ____ (.5 point) References – Did you add a Reference page with correct APA formatted references?
The human respiratory tract microbial community structures in healthy and cystic fibrosis infants. Marie-Madlen Pust, Lutz Wiehlmann, Colin Davenport, Isa Rudolf, Anna-Maria Dittrich, and Burkhard Tümmler.
Introduction Include an introductory paragraph that includes the following:
- The author’s name(s) and the title of the article
- The author’s main point
- A thesis statement that previews your analysis
Summary: After your introduction, discuss the following in your own words:
- The main points of the article : Fifty-two deep cough swabs from healthy children between 0 and 6 years of age, with no medical history or suspicion of pulmonary diseases were collected by trained paediatricians, during the regular preventive medical examination or at kindergartens and local parent–child meetings in Hannover, Germany. Forty-one children with CF were recruited from the Cystic Fibrosis Outpatient Clinic at Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany. Eleven CF participants were screened longitudinally after diagnosis following the CF newborn screening (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1).
- The arguments presented in the article
- The findings of the article
Critique: After summarizing the article, critique the article by doing the following:
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article that you noted while critically reading the article.
- State your informed opinions about the clarity, relevancy, and accuracy of the article, using specific examples from the article to support your statements.
Conclusion: Finally, end your article critique with a conclusion that does the following: Summarize the key points in the article, as well the key points from your own analysis.
Close with a comment about the significance of the research or a statement of future research needed in the field.
The human respiratory tract microbial community structures in healthy and cystic fibrosis infants. Marie-Madlen Pust, Lutz Wiehlmann, Colin Davenport, Isa Rudolf, Anna-Maria Dittrich, and Burkhard Tümmler.
Introduction Include an introductory paragraph that includes the following:
- The author’s name(s) and the title of the article
- The author’s main point
- A thesis statement that previews your analysis
Summary: After your introduction, discuss the following in your own words:
- The main points of the article : Fifty-two deep cough swabs from healthy children between 0 and 6 years of age, with no medical history or suspicion of pulmonary diseases were collected by trained paediatricians, during the regular preventive medical examination or at kindergartens and local parent–child meetings in Hannover, Germany. Forty-one children with CF were recruited from the Cystic Fibrosis Outpatient Clinic at Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany. Eleven CF participants were screened longitudinally after diagnosis following the CF newborn screening (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1).
- The arguments presented in the article
- The findings of the article
Critique: After summarizing the article, critique the article by doing the following:
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article that you noted while critically reading the article.
- State your informed opinions about the clarity, relevancy, and accuracy of the article, using specific examples from the article to support your statements.
Conclusion: Finally, end your article critique with a conclusion that does the following: Summarize the key points in the article, as well the key points from your own analysis.
Close with a comment about the significance of the research or a statement of future research needed in the field.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!