HSM410 Common Medical Care Structures of Twentieth Century
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
HSM410 Common Medical Care Structures of Twentieth Century
HSM410 Final Exam Study Guide
The final exam is valued at 250 points and made up of 10 multiple choice (6 points each), 4 short answer (15 points each), and 5 essay questions (25 points each). To earn full points, the short answer questions need to be answered in complete sentences; for the essay questions, you need to provide detailed responses that directly answer all parts of the question and provide supporting details and/or examples.
Key Terms / Concepts (Define)
Health Policy –
Regressive Payments –
Proportional Payments –
Dispersed Model of Care –
Regionalized Model of Care –
Patient Cost Sharing –
Rationing –
Deductibles –
Co-insurance –
Topics / Areas To Review:
– The relationship of health outcomes & the uninsured
– What is the role of the “gatekeeper”
– Components of high quality care
– Identify the most common medical care structures of the twentieth century
– Current issues in medical ethics
– Examples of Painless Cost Control; Why are they painless?
– Cost Controlling Mechanisms
– Health Care services that fall under Long Term Care
– Issues that affect the quality of health care services
– Categories of national health insurance plans
– The primary features of national health insurance plans
– Non-financial barriers to accessing health services
– Identify the modes of paying for health care
– Strategies of Prevention
– Identify & Define the four principles of medical ethics
– Define the three models of organizing care (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary)
– How does malpractice affect the quality of health services
– The relationship between costs and health outcomes
– Why private health insurance has decreased over past decades
– Transferring financial risk
– Define price controls and provide examples
– Define global budgeting and provide examples
– Identify U.S. legislative efforts that support the concept of “medical care as a right of citizenship” and those that are against this concept
– What are the primary challenges of the employer-based system of health care
– Identify what the most pressing issues in health policy will be for the next 10 years and why
– Identify the major actors (stakeholders) of the health care system
– Identify the cost containment measures used in the four countries identified in Chapter 14
ATLEAST 6 PAGES
I have completed 4 individual projects for this class and i need your help to do 5th individual project. You may need to review my 4 old individual project (shouldn’t take more than 1 hour) so you can write about 5th individual project.
The project deliverables are as follows:
Update the Human Element in IT Strategy document title page with a new date.
Update the previously completed sections based on instructor feedback.
Behavioral Layers
Evaluate the issues and concerns regarding IT projects at all 5 behavioral layers of the organization.
These layers include the individual, team, project, organizational, and business layers.
For each layer, describe the issues and concerns that are important to the success of the business with regard to IT projects, and provide examples that demonstrate the importance of the issues and concerns.
Human Elements in IT Strategy document
Review the entire document for any changes and improvements that you would like to make.
All aspects of the document should present a cohesive strategy, and each weekly topic should coincide with the other weeks.
Ensure that this final version of the document is sufficiently detailed to allow the organization to confidently move forward with the strategy for taking the human elements of the IT organization into account during projects.
Any previous instructor feedback should be addressed with appropriate changes.
part2
ATLEAST 6 PAGES
I can provide you all old 4 projects that are completed so you review them. My project for this class to work online ordering application ‘Sobmeer online watch company’. here below are the 5th project details.
Part 2 Tasks (Objectives from Week 5)
In the final week, you are given the assignment to craft an integration and deployment plan for your selected application or system that includes the required resources and work breakdown structure of implementation tasks.
The project deliverables are as follows:
Update the System Requirements, Design, and Implementation Specification title page with the new date.
Update the previously completed sections based on the instructor’s and peers’ review feedback.
Integration and Deployment Plan
Develop an overall work breakdown structure (WBS) for the 7 system development life cycle (SDLC) phases:
Preliminary Analysis
System Analysis or Requirements Definition
System Design
Development
Integration and Testing
Acceptance, Installation, and Deployment
Operation Support and Maintenance
Add activities under the first 5 phases that you already performed in Weeks 1–4.
Add activities that are specific to the final 2 phases in SDLC for deployment and ongoing maintenance and support.
The due date for all this work is June/23 / 2014. Please reply me asap if you are available to do this homework before deadline.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!