how your culture differs from that of colleague
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
how your culture differs from that of colleague
After completing the assigned readings for this week, think about a person from a different culture with whom you work or have worked or interacted professionally. Do some research on the culture and how it differs from your own. Create a brief PowerPoint presentation explaining
- how this culture differs from your own
- the key considerations when conducting business with or working with people from this culture (e.g., how to greet somebody, distance etc.)
- your suggestions/recommendations on how successful business interactions would be achieved with people from this different culture
- your recommendations on how somebody should learn about a different culture in preparation for working with people from different countries or of different ethnicities.
Remember to use good slide design. You may use a format of your choice to present this material. Do not exceed 10 slides. Cite when necessary and include a references list.
Rubric
F19_PowerPoint Presentation
F19_PowerPoint Presentation Criteria Ratings Pts Critical Thinking
25.0 to >22.5 pts Proficient
Identifies and accurately summarizes key points and ideas. Provides complete and thoughtful analysis while demonstrating in-depth understanding of course concepts.
22.5 to >20.0 pts Competent
Identifies and summarizes most key points and ideas of the project. Provides good analysis while demonstrating some understanding of course concepts.
20.0 to >17.5 pts Marginal
Identifies and/or summarizes some aspects of the project. Demonstrates an effort to provide some analysis.
17.5 to >0.0 pts Weak
Does not identify or accurately summarize important aspects of the project. Provides no analysis and demonstrates little to no understanding of course concepts.
0.0 pts No Marks
25.0 pts Organization
25.0 to >22.5 pts Proficient
Topics are presented in a well-organized manner. The flow of information is logical and easy to follow.
22.5 to >20.0 pts Competent
There is good organization of material. The order in which topics were presented was good but some topics were out of order.
20.0 to >17.5 pts Marginal
The topics and materials were not ordered well making the logic leading to conclusions difficult to follow.
17.5 to >0.0 pts Weak
There was little organization of materials making it very difficult to understand the purpose, analysis and conclusions.
0.0 pts No Marks
25.0 pts Visual Design
25.0 to >22.5 pts Proficient
Used good design techniques making the slides easy to read. The style used was uncluttered and graphics effectively enhanced the slide message and content.
22.5 to >20.0 pts Competent
Mostly used good design techniques resulting in slides that were readable and without unnecessary distractions from a cluttered style or ineffective graphics or animations.
20.0 to >17.5 pts Marginal
Used design techniques and styles that made the text difficult to read. The design, use of graphics or animation distracted from the message and content.
17.5 to >0.0 pts Weak
Unable to read the text on the slides. The styles, graphs and animations overpowered the message and content.
0.0 pts No Marks
25.0 pts Audience
15.0 to >13.5 pts Proficient
Demonstrates understanding of the knowledge, experience and interest of audience. Slide content presented in a manner that the audience could understand and be engaged with it.
13.5 to >12.0 pts Competent
Demonstrates understanding of the knowledge, experience and interest of audience. Audience would be able to understand most of the message being communicated and would be mostly engaged in the communication.
12.0 to >10.5 pts Marginal
Demonstrates understanding of the knowledge, experience and interest of audience. Audience would be able to understand some of the communication and would be somewhat engaged in the communication.
10.5 to >0.0 pts Weak
Demonstrates minimal attention to the knowledge, experience and interest of audience. Audience would find it difficult to understand the communication and would not be engaged in the communication.
0.0 pts No Marks
15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, Spelling
10.0 to >9.0 pts Proficient
The presentation slides are mostly free of errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
9.0 to >8.0 pts Competent
Very few errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. The errors are minor and do not detract from the work.
8.0 to >6.0 pts Marginal
Errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling cause distraction when viewing the presentation slides.
6.0 to >0.0 pts Weak
Numerous errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling throughout the presentation slides detract from the message of the presentation.
0.0 pts No Marks
10.0 pts Total Points: 100.0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!