Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
How To Step Back From Being A Leader
Leadership Change: How to step back from being a leader (manager) and become a leader follower
(non-managerial) after the Military and still be successful.
Please provided the following information in the paper.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction (6 Pages)
A. Background of the Problem
B. Purpose of the Study (briefly introducing the study and research questions)
C. Significance (briefly explaining who your study will be of value to and why)
Summary
Chapter 2: Literature Review (6 Pages)
This features a discussion of literature related to the research topic and comes from research carried
out by other experts on a previous date. It shows how your research diverts from or is like common
interpretations. Please include the following on the article you are reviewing. Book/Journal title,
Author(s), Editor(s) (edited books only), Chapter Title, Page(s), URL (for online sources only), and
Publisher
Review of Literature
Military Leadership Development
Veterans in the Workplace
Chapter 3: Conceptual Framework (6 Pages)
(Situates your work within a conceptual framework, explains key constructs, introduces, or clarifies
any theoretical models involves, and situations your work within prior theory and research on the
question; begin with an introductory paragraph introducing the elements of the conceptual
framework and conclude with a summation that helps review the need for your study and thus
transitions to the methodology)
Chapter 4: Methodology (6 Pages)
In this case, the author dwells into discussing the sources of data and methods of collecting such
data for the project. For instance, the primary methods, visual methods, and secondary data can be
considered. The temptation is always trying to make this as short as possible when writing a
dissertation proposal, yet it is the section that guides on what must practically be done. It also
reveals the resources needed, amount of work and time to carry out each specific task to complete
the project.
Research Design (with justification and citations of other research using that approach or to
theorists of that approach) [usually needed for qualitative, possibly for quantitative]
Qualitative/Quantitative Research Design
Research Sites/Population/Sampling/Subjects/Participants
Procedures [usually needed for quantitative; less often used in qualitative]
Proposed Interview Method
Approach to Data Analysis
Research Perspective: Paradigms and Ethics
Ethics
Assumptions and Limitations
Timeline
Conclusion (2 Pages)
The final step in writing a dissertation proposal is to write a conclusion. The conclusion should briefly
summarize the main points of the proposal and emphasize the importance of the research. It should
also explain how the research will contribute to the field of study and why it is significant. Finally,
the conclusion should encourage readers to support the proposed research. By following these
steps, you can ensure that your dissertation proposal is well-written and persuasive.
References
Articles for the Literature Review can only come from the journals below.
Management and Leadership Journals
Academy of Management Learning & Education Academy of Management Learning & Education
(aom.org)
Academy of Management Review https://aom.org/research/journals/review
California Management Review https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cmr
Coaching: Int'l Journal of Theory, Research, & Practice (UK) CORE – Aggregating the world’s
open access research papers
Global Strategy Journal http://gsj.strategicmanagement.net/
International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration
http://www.nationalforum.com/Journals/International%20Journal%20of%20Management,%20Busi
ness,%20and%20Administration/International%20Journal%20of%20Management,%20Business,%20
and%20Administration/ijmba.htm
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science http://jab.sagepub.com/
Journal of Management Development http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0262-
1711
Management Learning http://mlq.sagepub.com/
Organization Development Network Publications http://www.odnetwork.org/?Publications
Sloan Management Review http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2012-winter/
Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal http://sej.strategicmanagement.net/
Strategic Management Journal http://smj.strategicmanagement.net/
Appendix (3 Pages if needed)
Qualifying Survey questions to answer the research question. Place questions that will be answered
during the surveys. Along with any scales used.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!