Hospital Data Analysis and Reporting Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Hospital Data Analysis and Reporting Project
Management affiliation
Course Project: Hospital Data Analysis and Reporting
Objective
The purpose of this Course Project is to apply the knowledge gained in analyzing various performance indicators of a hospital, analyzing trends, determining compliance or poor performance areas, and providing recommendations for improvement or solutions.
Guidelines
For this Course Project, you are asked to analyze a number of status reports for General Hospital, determine compliance with indicators provided to you, and provide suggestions or make recommendations for improvement where needed.
Data on the following indicators are provided in a Microsoft Excel document.
Release of Information Reports (ROI)
Record Completion: Physician Orders (PO)
Record Completion: History and Physical (H & P)
Record Completion: Discharge Summary (DC Summary)
Report Completion: Operative Report (OP Report)
Incident Reports (IR)
Standards
Rubric (grading rubric)
Part 1: Data Calculations, Standards, and Compliance Notes
Turn the General Hospital status data given for the month of January into meaningful information by performing the following.
Point Values General Criteria Specific Data Calculation, Standards, and Compliance Rate Components 40 points 5 points for each type of calculation listed in the last column Calculations necessary to find completion timeliness for the following on the next column Release of information for all 20 requests (how many days it took to release the information requested) Physician orders (how many days it took every physician to sign each of his or her orders)
History and physical dictation (how many days it took to dictate the H & P for each admission—subtract date of admission from the date of dictation)
History and physical transcription (how many days it took to transcribe the H & P—subtract date of dictation from the date of transcription)
Discharge summary dictation (how many days it took to dictate the DC for each admission—subtract date of discharge from the date of dictation)
Discharge summary signature (how many days it took to sign the DC—subtract date of discharge from the date signed)
Operative report dictation (how many days it took to dictate the OP report for each admission—subtract date of surgery from the date of dictation)
1. Operative report signature (how many days it took to sign the OP report—subtract date of surgery from the date signed)
15 points Standards* for the following on the next column *Standards can be added in each worksheet applicable to the item being analyzed.
Completing ROI requests in the cases when records are on-site or off-site Signing orders
Dictating a history and physical
Signing a discharge summary
1. Dictating an operative report
30 points 5 points for each of the items listed in the last column Compliance rates based on the standards identified for the following on the next column ROI requests Physician orders
Dictation of History and Physical
Signing of Discharge Summary
1. Dictation of Operative Report
85 points total Meets all of the components listed above Part 2: Report
Write a two-page report formatted as a memo detailing area of noncompliance and at least three recommendations for improvement. The content of the report should be based on your prior calculations, highlights, and compliance notes from the prior analysis and other insight from analyzing the incident report, core measure, and meaningful use data. For full credit, the memo should include the following.
Point Value Memo Components 10 points Short introductory paragraph identifying the purpose and scope of the report 15 points A paragraph highlighting areas that the hospital is in compliance with, including release of information, record documentation and completion, and incident reports. Paragraph should start with a summary sentence and then provide more details (including data) on each area the hospital is performing well. 25 points A paragraph that addresses noncompliance, which should include the items below A summary of the areas of noncompliance.
Any trends identified regarding a specific type of document (such as H & P or orders, certain physicians, core measures, etc.)
Emphasis on two to three noncompliant items that are most serious or important in your opinion
· Clear details on all noncompliant items by using tables, graphs, or bullet points
25 points A paragraph that explains at least three recommendations for improvement, which need to apply knowledge gained about performance improvement activities, tools, techniques, and information systems or other technology, as well as processes and working with people. Recommendations for improvement should be specific to issues identified in the prior paragraph. 5 points Grammar and formatting. Memo format is required. 5 points Content of the memo is well organized. Information in the paragraphs is well connected and supported with data. For example, if you identify an area of non-compliance, it will be expected to provide a recommendation for improvement for that particular issue. 85 points Meets all of the components listed above Grading Rubric
Category Points % Description Deliverable: Part 1 Part 1: Data Calculations, Standards, and Compliance Notes Completion Timeliness Calculated for the Hospital 40 Calculations necessary to find completion timeliness for each of the items listed above Compliance Standards Identified 15 Standards for each item as listed above identified Compliance Rates Calculated for the Hospital 30 Compliance rates calculated based on the standards identified for each item listed Total points 85 50% Deliverable: Part 2 Part 2: Report Introduction 10 Short introductory paragraph identifying the purpose and scope of the report Areas of Compliance 15 Paragraph highlighting areas of compliance as described above Areas of Noncompliance 25 Paragraph addressing areas of noncompliance as described above Recommendations 25 Minimum of three recommendations for improvement with justification Grammar and Formatting 5 Memo format is to be followed and writing should be free of grammar errors Organization and Cohesiveness 5 Content is well organized, connected, and supported by data. Total points for Week 7 85 50% Total 170 100 A quality project will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Tools and Resources
Access to Microsoft Word and Excel
Professional memo template to use for your report
All project-related documents available in Doc Sharing formatted as Word, Excel, or PDF files
Access to the Internet
Medicare Conditions of Participation requirements pertaining to documentation and clinical quality
Meaningful Use Requirements for Hospitals, Stage 1
HIPAA requirements in relation to release of information (ROI). A good resource to check out is http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/special/healthit/eaccess.pdf
The Joint Commission requirements pertaining to documentation, core measures, and national patient safety goals
Best Practices
Remember that the goal is to practice good data management skills—understanding, calculations, comparisons, analysis, and evaluation.
Read detailed instructions for each item (more than once) until you gain clarity, and ask the instructor early if you have any questions.
Familiarize yourself with the various formats of data and use of formulas in Excel.
Practice good critical thinking skills.
Take clear and consistent notes as you are doing your calculations.
Use all the resources provided to you and do extra research to gain clarity on the compliance standards for all areas of review.
Practice good writing skills—clear and concise statements, well-organized details to support your findings, and justifications for your recommendations.
Submitting Course Project Deliverables
Submit your assignment to Dropbox for it section.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!